ANALYSIS INFORMATION FROM A EUROPEAN PERSPECTIVE

PETROFILM.COM

Harald Dahle-Sladek

Founder and Editor-in-chief

 Основатель и главный редактор

 創始人兼總編輯

THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

Covid-19 Vaccinations:

more Solidarity and Transparency needed.

After scientific evaluation and positive recommendation by the Euro-pean Medicines Agency, the European Commission  granted condit-ional market authorization to the first vaccine against Covid-19, developed by BioNTech and Pfizer, on 21 December 2020. Vaccin-ations across the EU started shortly afterwards on 27 December. On 6 January 2021, Moderna’s vaccine was given conditional market authorization. The vaccine developed by AstraZeneca could be authorized by the end of January.

Under the EU Vaccines Strategy launched in June 2020, the Com-mission negotiated and concluded advance purchase agreements with vaccines developers on behalf of EU countries; the EU covers part of the costs faced by the producers in return for the right to buy a specified amount of vaccine doses in a given timeframe and at a given price, once they are granted market authorization. So far, six contracts with pharmaceutical companies have been concluded.

Background: The Race for Vaccines

From the very beginning of the coronavirus outbreak, the European Parliament has closely followed the vaccine research and development process. The EU coordinated a joint effort to secure the speedy deployment of vaccines against the disease, through the mobilization of hundreds of million euros for research projects and more flexible procedures. Parliament approved a temporary derogation from certain rules for clinical trials to allow vaccines to be developed faster.

 2.3 billion

  doses of vaccines have been secured so far. 



MEPs on the health committee repeatedly highlighted the need for public trust in vaccines and the importance of fighting disinformation and asked for more transparency regarding vaccine contracts, authorization and deployment in the EU.



MEPs supported the EU's common approach to fighting Covid-19 and called for more unity and clarity during a debate on the roll-out of vaccines and the EU's vaccines strategy.

During a plenary debate on 19 January about the EU’s strategy on Covid-19 vaccinations, most MEPs expressed support for the EU's common approach, which ensured the quick development and access to safe vaccines. However, they called for even more solidarity when it comes to vaccinations and transparency regarding contracts with pharmaceutical companies.

Esther de Lange (EPP, Netherlands) said: “Only more transparency can take away the widespread perception – whether this is justified or not – that often, too often, profit is put before people in this (pharmaceutical) industry.” She praised the EU's joint purchase of vaccines, which led to a stronger negotiation position than individual EU countries would have had: “That means more vaccines for a better price and under better conditions. It shows what Europe can do when we stand united. We can help save lives.”

Iratxe García Pérez (S&D, Spain) warned against "health national-ism" that could damage cooperation on vaccines in Europe. According to her, solidarity and unity is the answer: “If we can keep unity and have equitable distribution of vaccines in member states, we have reasons to believe that 380 million European citizens will be vaccinated by the summer. This is a scientific and health feat that cannot be ruined by parallel contracts and direct purchases." She added: "Let us speak with one voice so that the largest vaccination campaign in history will bring hope back to us in 2021.”

“What are we doing exactly to increase the speed of administering vaccines across the EU?” asked Dacian Cioloș (Renew, Romania). “I know this is a race against time, but in this race we cannot forget that we have a responsibility to do things in full transparency, a responsibility to our citizens to gain their trust. That trust is largely what the vaccination campaign depends on."

Joëlle Mélin (ID, France) said the negotiation of the vaccine contracts lacked transparency. “We are now in the distribution phase and we discover that there are shortages and broken promises from the pharmaceutical companies,” she added.

Philippe Lamberts (Greens/EFA) also talked about the need for transparency and the fact that the European Commission kept the contracts with laboratories secret: “This opaqueness is an insult to democracy. In every single contract the buyer has to know what he or she is buying at what conditions and what price.” He also spoke about potential liability issues: “It is crucial to know who will hold the liability if there were to be negative side effects of the vaccination - would it be the public decision makers or would it be the drug makers? We have no idea.”

Joanna Kopcińska (ECR, Poland) said the decision for the common vaccination strategy was right: “We need an overarching strategy and of course scepticism has a lot to do with a fear that the vaccination is moving slowly, the delivery is maybe late and the contracts are not transparent." She called for the systematic update of treatment strategies and appropriate information campaigns that reach out to everyone.

Marc Botenga (The Left, Belgium) called for more transparency of contracts and responsibility from pharmaceutical companies. He criticised uneven access to vaccines globally, noting poorer regions have difficulties obtaining enough vaccines. “No profit needs to be made on this pandemic and we certainly do not want segregation at vaccinations.”

Health Commissioner Stella Kyriakides assured MEPs that their calls for transparency had been heard. She welcomed the fact that the first of the vaccine suppliers had agreed to make the text of their contract available and said the Commission was working to get other producers to do the same.

Kyriakides said she expects to see more applications for the authorization of vaccines in the coming months. She stressed the importance of a global approach: “No country will be safe and no economy will truly recover until the virus is under control in all continents." She also talked about Covax - the global facility to ensure fair and universal access to Covid-19 vaccines that the EU helped to set up - which aims to purchase two billion doses by the end of 2021, including more than 1.3 billion for lower- and middle-income countries.

Ana Paula Zacarias, the Portuguese Secretary of State for European Affairs who was speaking on behalf of the Council, said the common EU approach, which sped up the process of developing, authorizing and securing access to vaccines, must continue to ensure the availability and efficient rollout of vaccines in all member states.

Zacarias said that a number of issues still need to be resolved, including the format and role of the vaccination certificate, a common approach on the use and validation of antigen rapid tests and the mutual recognition of Covid-19 test results.

THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN

CLICK: PETROFILM.COM AT FRIDAY PRAYER IN TEHRAN

 Top Iran leader posts Trump-like Golfer image, vows Revenge.

 The Twitter account of Iran's Supreme Leader on Friday carried the image of a golfer resembling former President Donald Trump appar-ently being targeted by a drone, vowing revenge over the killing of general Quasem Soleimani in a U.S. drone attack.

Leader Ali Khamenei: A man for his words

CLICK: REVOLUTIONARY GUARD YOUTH SECTION ON DISPLAY

The post carried the text of remarks by Ayatollah Ali Khamenei in December, in which he said "Revenge is certain", renewing a vow of vengeance ahead of the first anniversary of the killing of top military commander General Qasem Soleimani in the attack in Iraq. "Those who ordered the murder of General Soleimani as well as those who carried this out should be punished. This revenge will certainly happen at the right time," Khamenei tweeted on December 16, without naming Trump, who had ordered the strike. Tehran military parade.

Click: for Iranian general Quasem Soleimani's daughter

Click: The Revolutionary Guard's Corps

Seal of the Foreign Ministry

MANOUCHEHR MOTTAKI

FOREIGN MINISTER IN PRESIDENT MAHMOUD AMEDINEJAD'S GOVERNMENT

Oslo Military Society 2007

CLICK PLAY VISION OF IRAN VIDEO

From U.S. Dollars to a Bascet of Curriencies

Manouchehr Mottaki interviewed by Editor-in-Chief

Dahle: - Your Excellency Mottaki, Iran is shying away from trading in US Dollars. Why is that? 

Mottaki: - Central Bank Governor Valiollah Seif said last week that Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei had welcomed his suggestion of replacing the dollar with the euro in foreign trade, as the “dollar has no place in our transactions today”. I believe this has been a good decition by the Central Bank Governor.

Dahle: -I understand that Iran is relying on a basket of currencies, such as the Euro and the Yen.

Mottaki: -Tehran has been trying for years to move away from the dollar, although much of the country’s international trade is still conducted in dollars and ordinary Iranians use them for travel and savings.

Dahle: -I understand. Bank transactions involving the dollar are already difficult for Iran because legal risks make U.S. banks unwilling to do business with Tehran. Foreign firms can be exposed to sanctions if they do Iranian deals in dollars, even if the operations involve non-U.S. branches.

Mottaki: -France will start offering euro-denominated credits to Iranian buyers of its goods later this year to keep its trade out of reach of U.S. sanctions, the head of state-owned French investment bank Bpi-France said in February. The threat of U.S. sanctions has destabilized Iran’s foreign exchange market in recent month

Dahle: -Khamenei on Wednesday blamed foreign enemies for the “recent issues in the currency market” and asked Iran’s intelligence services to defuse the plots against the Islamic Republic. Police spokesman Saeed Montazer al-Mahdi was also quoted by ISNA saying that 39 currency exchangers have been arrested “for disrupting the market” and 80 unlicensed currency exchange shops have been shut down in recent days.

THE AGGRESSIVE

AND DEHUMANIZING TREATMENT BY THE NORWEGIAN MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS

Two Foreign Ministries with totally opposing views lead to the biggest industrial scandal for Norway after the War. Norway was thrown out of the Islamic Republic in 2003, after the deafening STATOIL bribary case was revealed for the entire world to watch. But it didn't stop there (Read my analysis of the case: END GAME TEHRAN) Norway was thrown out of China as well and had to crawl back on it's knees and appologize to the Chinese leaders, one-by-one. 

Foreign Minister Jan Pettersen (2001-2005): A man with a fist!

The Royal Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Oslo

Disrespectfulness towards Iran quickly lead to big schism. Having had contact with oposition groups to Iran, Oslo played on both sides of the street, which angered Tehran immensely.

Seal of the Foreign Ministry

THE FOREIGN MINISTRY

AMBASSADOR NOGHREhKAR SHIRAZI AMBASSADOR TO OSLO 2000-2004

Shortly after, due to the Statoil bribery case, the relation between the two parties soured . Although the period of Ambassador Shirazi was a good one and the bilateral trade was strengthened, it ended on a sour note. Photo C)2003 Harald Dahle-Sladek

Iran’s Ambassador to Oslo and former Governor of Shiraz, His Excel-lency Noghrehkar Shirazi is seen here leaving the Head-quarters of the National Iranian Oil Company NIOC after the completion of the last meeting on minister level between Norway and Iran in May 2003.

Last Minister meeting National Iranian Oil Company NIOC

May 27, 2003

The Iranian side to the right, Norwegian side to the left. From right to left, Mr Talebian Head of the NIOC Protocol Departrment, woman in black speaker for Minister of oil Mr. Zangeneh, Mr, Zangeneh as number three, and Ambassador Noghrehkar Shirazias number four. Photo(C)2003 Harald Dahle-Sladek

 IRAN

The Iranian Embassy Oslo, 2002

November 9, 2002. Producer, director of the Vision of Iran dialogue films Harald Dahle to the left is seen here with Deputy Foreign Minister Ali Ahani center, later Ambassador to Paris, and Ambassador Noghrekar Shirazi in thge first floor reception room in the Iranian Embassy in Oslo. Harald Dahle was part of the Persian Carpet seismic project (PC2000) from 1998-2003 which mapped the coast of Iran with six seismic vessels from Hendijan in the North to the Oman Sea in the South.

Ambassador Noghrehkar Shirazi, right, proudly displays the DVD video cassette containing the Vision of Iran filmed dialogue talks that Harald Dahle had in done in Tehran. Shirazi to Dahle, "Maybe you do the work that the Norwegian Foreign Department should have done twenty years ago!" Deputy Foreign Minister Ali Ahani center. Photo by Deputy Head of Mission Mr. Rezvani.

AN INDIGNANT REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN

Ambassador Noghrekar Shirazi to the Editor-in-chief:

"My be you do the job they (the Norwegian Foreign Ministry) should have done twenty years ago!"

The Iranian Embassy Oslo. From left Harald Dahle-Sladek, Ambassa-dor to Paris Ali Ahani, Ambassador to Oslo Nogrehkar Shirazi. Picture by Deputy Head of Mission Rezvani.

Foreign Ministry Tehran



Seal of the Foreign Ministry Tehran

HE Noghrekar Shirazi

TEHRAN'S AMBASSADOR TO OSLO 2000-2004

Interviewed December 8, 2003 in the Iranian Embassy Oslo

Ambassador Noghrekar Shirazi

interviewed by Harald Dahle

Editor-in-Chief: Before you came to Oslo in 2000, you had been Ambassador to Vienna in Austria, right?

Ambassador Shirazi: Yes, I was Ambasador for two periods, eight years, and both of my children were borne in Vienna. The time there was a happy time filled with good memories. We have three Iranian Ambassadors to Vienna. One at the International Atomic Energy Agency IAEA, one at the United Nations and one at the Embassy.

Editor-in-Chief: Ambassador Shirazi, regarding Oslo, why have the rules for dialogue between the Iranian Embassy and the Norwegian Government been changed. According to Mr. Rezvani, your Deputy Head of Mission, I understand that such an agreement recently has been taking place?

Ambassador Shirazi: The Norwegian Government wants that negotiations between the two sides shall not include third party, in other words only direct negotiations is possible.

Editor-in-Chief: Yes, but clearly the way dialogue has taken place up til now did function very satisfactory for both sides for many years, so why this sudden demand for a change?

Ambassador Shirazi: The other side did not see it that way. One wanted to be sure that information and point of views only reached the negotiating parties. We have no objections to that, although we found the new arrangement somewhat unnecessary and limiting. We believe that an open and free dialogue give the best result.

Editor-in-Chief: How do you view the situation for Iran at the present moment?

Ambassador Shirazi: I am deeply concerned.

Editor-in-Chief: Why is that?

Ambassador Shirazi: The threat of an attack from the Jewish State; the situation for the people of Palestine and the growing tensions between the United States and Iran. Alle these elements together create an atmosphere of uncertainty.

Editor-in-Chief: What about the Norway-Iran relations? They also seem a tad gloomy at the moment.

Ambassador Shirazi: The Nobel Peace Prize to Shirin Ebadi is viewed as a destabilizing factor between the two sides. We don't like the present development. It ads to a year long dissatisfaction between the Norwegian Foreign Department in Oslo and our own Foreign Ministry in Tehran. Oslo wanted to play on both sides of the street, have good contacts with opposition groups to Iran, and at the same time develop a good relation with Tehran. Naturally, we are not very happy about this. But now we see an opportunity to mend old ties and develop strong relations, and we are eager to do just that.

Editor-in-Chief: We had a meeting on July 7, and on July 9 this year the Iranian Embassy, were we are sitting right now, was attacked by people hostile to the present regime. Could you please tell us what happened?

Ambassador Shirazi: They tried to break through the front door and almost succeeded in doing that. It was terrible, they shouted nasty words towards me. The police came and treated the mob as friends. One policeman put his arm around one of the angry demonstrators just as a father would do to his daughter. The protection of our Embassy was laughable, and we have filed a protest. Also, we have film of the whole break in. By now our front door has been much strengthened. The mood in the Embassy was gloomy and we seriously considered to call everything off. As you know, I have a weak heart and was brought to hospital for a short period.

Editor-in-Chief: On July 2, Your Excellency, Deputy Head of Mission Mr. Rezvani and myself had meeting were we discussed the negative response of the Norwegian Foreign Department to my work in the Islamic Republic. Would you care to make a comment on why there is such a negative attitude?

Ambassador Shirazi: They observe that you run faster than them and manage to get in on a high level, and this angers them enorm-ously, it seems.

Editor-in-Chief: On November 19 last year, there was a dinner here in the Embassy were Deputy Foreign Minister Ali Ahani with two other representatives from the Foreign Ministry in Tehran was present, together with yourself Ambassador Shirazi, and Mr. Rezvani. I was also invited. My Vision of Iran Dialogue Films came up as a subject. Could you, Ambassador Shirazi be so kind and to tell us what kind of vision you see for the people of Iran?

Ambassador Shirazi: I hope that the relations between Norway and Iran will increase. Both people want peace and prosperity, and I seriously believe that Norway can contribute to a better situation for our people, especially in the oil and gas sector, but also in other areas such a food, agriculture and technology. This is the start of a marriage and there are lots of opportunities for both sides.

Editor-in-Chief: Thank you Ambassador Shirazi.

 

Seal of the Foreign Ministry

AMBASSADOR ALI AHANI 

The Foreign Ministry was Indignant.

In 2000 Norway finally entered the Islamic Republic of Iran. Then, the Foreign Department in Tehran had waited for twenty years or more wondering why Norway, with its specialized deep-water technologies, had not come and helped Iran to build the South Pars project, and other offshore and onshore projects.

Harald Dahle, "When I arrived the Foreign Department in Tehran in April 2002 the mood was somber, to say the least. Ambassador Ali Ahani was angry. The Norwegian Foreign Department had for years played on both sides of the street cultivating contacts with opposition groups to Iran, like the Mujahidin Kalk MEK. The attitude from the Norwegians had been cordial, but stiff, and had not reflected the greatness in the Iranian culture and its people. Tehran was very hurt."

Dahle-Sladek: -With regards to Norway and Iran relations Ambassador Ahani, I notice some slight irritation on your part, why is that?

Ali-Ahani: -In fact, the Islamic Republic of Iran and Norway have many opportunities. In addition to the economic and industrial cooperation we have oil and gas. I would like to emphasize the importance for us to finalize the oil and gas projects in the South along the Persian Gulf, as well as in the Caspian Sea. Norway and Iran are two important oil producing countries and can cooperate and coordination in the world oil market and stabilize oil prices, which would be in the interest of both oil producers and oil consumers.

Dahle-Sladek: -You mentioned that the Norwegian Foreign Minister Jan Pettersen's visit to Tehran was a kind of watershed. Could you please explain that?

Ali-Ahani: In fact, in the past years, our relations lacked the sufficient momentum to further expand our relations. And in fact, compared to other countries in Europe, our relations with Norway were lagging behind. The visit of your Foreign Minister to Tehran show the firm determination of your country for the expansion of the relations with Iran. And certainly, there is such a political will and enthusiasm on the part of the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran!

Dahle-Sladek: -Thank you Dr. Ahani.

Foreign Ministry Tehran April 2002. Ambassador to Europe and America Ali Ahani center and Harald Dahle-Sladek right; translator to the left.

Seal of the Foreign Ministry Tehran

DEPUTY FOREIGN MINISTER FOR ECONOMIC AFFAIRS

H.E. SEYED HOSSEIN ADELI

Adeli: Difficulties should be settled as a non-armed conflict

Interview with Hussein Adeli Deputy Foreign Minister for Economic Affairs in the Foreign Ministry Tehran April 2002. Adeli was the former Governor of the Central Bank, Ambassador to Tokyo and Ottawa. He was interviewed by Editor-in-Chief Harald Dahle-Sladek in the Foreign Department in Tehran.

Seyed Hossein Adeli and Harald Dahle-Sladek Editor-in-Chief of Petrofilm.com in Adeli's office the Foreign Ministry Teheran April 2002.

    CLICK PICTURE PLAY VIDEO

Tehran April 2002 meeting

In April 2002 and in May 2003 the Editor-in-Chief had several meetings in the Foreign Ministry in Tehran. There I met with Dr. Hossein Adeli, Deputy Foreign Minister for Economic Affairs who was busy, but was very generous and took time off to talk with me. Adeli’s diplomatic career progressed through his appointment as Iranian Ambassador to Canada in 1995.

Iraq and Afghanistan

At the end of his term in 1999, Adeli was nominated as Deputy Foreign Minister for Economic Affairs and the chairman of the Coordinating Council for Foreign Economic Relations until 2004. During these years, Adeli initiated two special committees for Reconstruction of Afghanistan and Reconstruction of Iraq through a series of multilateral arrangements, and filled the role of Secretary General for both committees.

Ambassador to United Kingdom

As his last official post, he served as Ambassador Extraordinary Pleni-potentiary of Iran to the United Kingdom. At his time, he along with John Curtis and several others lobbied with Iranian Government to borrow 80 items for a new exhibition named "The Forgotten Empire".

 

PETROFILM.COM

 TEHRAN

Seyed Hossein Adeli, PhD.

Deputy Foreign Minister for Economic Affairs, Tehran

The Success of the United Sates in Afghanistan also comes as the Active Support from Iran. A Golden Opportunity for Washington to better its relations with Tehran went out of the Window. Harald Dahle reports.

Click picture Play video

Adeli: "Great disappointment!" Dahle: "Frustration was high."



INTERVIEWED APRIL 2002

THE SUCCESS OF

THE UNITED STATES

IN AFGHANISTAN  ALSO COMES AS THE ACTIVE SUPPORT FROM IRAN

Revolutionary icon Khomeini, Leader Khamenei



A GOLDEN OPORTUNITY

for Washington to better its relations with Teheran

went out of the window!

 CLICK PICTURE PLAY VIDEO

Dr. Adeli explains Iran's view regarding Afghanistand and the U.S.

Dr. Adeli: "Great disappointment!"



This interview was conducted in Dr. Hussein Adeli's office in the Foreign Ministry in Tehran. It was the first of two meetings that Harald Dahle had with Dr. Adeli. The first was in April 2002, and the second meeting was held in May 2003.

During the interview made in April of 2002  it became quite clear to the Editor-in-Chief, that the rejection of the United Sates to appreciate what Iran had done for the country in Afghanistan, neither did not sit well with the upper echelon of the Islamic Republic of Iran, nor was it well received by the Deputy Foreign Minister for Economic Affairs. This would have been a Golden Opportunity for the United States to better the relations with Iran, but in wain. Washington was not ready to hand Tehran a firm handshake.

Dahle: -Tehran has sent an invitation to Washington for a meeting and better the relations between the two sides. I understand that the United States has rejected this initiative. How do you view the current relations with the U.S. after this disappointment?

Adeli: -Well, actually our relations with the West in general has improved a lot during the last, may be four, five years.

Dahle: -Yes.

Adeli: -Specially with the policies that have been followed by President Khatami, Dialogue among Civilization, the Rule of Law, the Principles of Civil Society, the elimination of tensions between Iran or other countries, the elimination of misunderstanding. All of these policies have been seriously followed by Iran in its Foreign Policy and has contributed to the relations with all countries except the United States. And with the West in general we have been able to exchange delegations on the level of Foreign Minister and head of Governments.

Dahle: -Aren't the operations of the United States in Afghanistan very much based on the early assistance from Iran?

Adeli: -But with the United States, it is unfortunately to see, that even developments in Afghanistan, which owes a lot to understanding and effective assistance from Iran, has not, I believe, been able to penetrate into the hearts or the minds of decision makers in the United States.

Dahle: -Without the help from Iran in Afghanistan, you say that the United States would not have been where they are now?

Adeli: -I think that there is no doubt, even in the American eyes, that what we now see in the situation in Afghanistan owes a lot to Iranian assistance, Iranian understanding. The military success of the United States owes a lot to understanding and appreciation from Iran, and also the political process in Afghanistan owes the same thing. 

Adeli: -And may be that was a very unique opportunity for the United Sates to reciprocate these kinds of understanding, and to seize and stop those kinds of policies that are pursued by them, in the past couple of decades. But apparently there is still not a very strong sign from that side.

Dahle: -Iran has friendly relations with many countries in the world, so why not also with the United States?

Adeli: -Off course, the general policy of Iran is to have friendly relations with every country in the world, including the United States, provided that this kind of relationship would be based on an equal footing, on a mutual beneficial sort of relationship. So, this is why I think that, as the policies of the United States, which are normally a unilateral policy, we hope that one time they would join the other countries of the West and developing countries, and would join that kind of understanding of Iran. That the developments in the region would open their eyes, and that they would adopt a new policy towards our country!

Dahle: -Thank you Dr. Adeli.

CLICK PICTURE PLAY STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP TREATYUSA: President Obama                         Afghanistan: President Karzai

Seal of the Foreign Ministry

ALI KHORRAM

 AMBASSADOR TO BEJING 1982-1986

Interviewed by the Editor-in-Chief April 2002 in Tehran

CLICK PLAY ALI KHORRAM INTERVIEW

 Harald Dahle-Sladek

  Editor-in-Chief

Editor-in-Chef: Ambassador Khorram, you have had a fascinating time in the Peoples Republic of China for four years in a time when the country went through great transition from Communist Era to a modern Market oriented Era. Could you please tell us about your experiences in this regard, thank you.

Ambassador Akli Khorram: Yes, certainly. And as you mentioned it was indeed a time of great changes. In 1982 when I arrived in China I understood that Mr. Deng Xiaoping was keen to open the country to the outside world. In that respect he wanted to develop the politcal system in China, so I think he initiated Free Zones, lor Special Economic Zones in China. In that respect Chaiman Deng wanted to prepare, or develop a similar system to Hong Kong, Taiwan and Macao.

Editor-in-Cief: Was that a realistic view, you think?

Ambassador Ali Khorram: People started to build new cities in new areas. Near Hong Kong, they built the area of Shenzhen - and in that time around 1982 it was just a small village - but already after just a few years that area was expanding and growing. In front of Macao, the Chines built Hainan island which developed very quickly into a fantastic area. Also in front of Taiwan China built Xiamen economic zone. Mr. Deng Xiaoping tried to use these special econiomic zones in Chinese definition, as new places of transformation from a Communist social system to a Market oriented system.'

Editor-in-Chief: Thank you Ambassador Khorram for your excellent in-depth analysis.

CLICK: WELCOME TO THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN

FBI AGENT LEVINSON

THE ROBERT A. LEVINSON KISH ISLAND IRAN CASE

By the Editor-in-chief

If you enter the lions quarter in a zoo, and the lions eat you, can we then say that the lions kidnappet you?

Kish Island Iran

When you are a former FBI Agent and enters Kish Island of the Islamic Republic of Iran you are on the same shallow level as with the mediocrity of the US Intelligence in Dubai, as I have experienced it in 2002. You simply do not know what you are talking about. In combination with an absolute disregard for the capability of the Iranian Intelligence Service.

Mr. Levinson was a fool to consider even remotely entering Kish, where I myself have spent six weeks on three different occasions between 1998 and 2002 taking part in two seminars, visiting the TOTAL supply base and had dialogue with many Iranian dignitaries whom I met with again later in Tehran.

CLICK TOTAL FINA ELF SUPPLY BASE

Kish Island University of Kish 2001, from left Reza Saheri Contract Director at MJF Engineering and Harald Dahle Editor-in-chief showing his Vision of Iran Dialogue Film Concept.

Harald Dahle's working card in Iran

Mr. Levinson was not "Kidnapped" as this below poster suggests. He freely, arrogantly and stupidly entered the Lion’s den as an Exclusive Enemy of the Islamic Republic of Iran, no less. What else can you expect! Total fiasco! The ongoing US media hype of this case underlines the collective factitious disorder in the American psyche with regards to the Islamic Republic of Iran today. When will you folks wake up? (Read my article, The Islamic Republic of Iran already have nuclear strike capability)

Before criticizing other countries the United States should look more into it's own extraordinary rendition activities, also called irregular rendition or forced rendition It is the government-sponsored abduction and extrajudicial transfer of a person from one country to another with the purpose of circumventing the former country's laws on interrogation, detention, and torture. Recent renditions have been carried out for example by the United States government .

New documents released by the CIA have revealed details about the detention of Khalid al-Masri, a German-Lebanese man mistaken for an al Qaeda member in 2003. He is yet to be given compensation or an apology from the US. Other documents released by the US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) have also revealed the Kafkaesque details of one of the most notorious cases of mistaken identity in the CIA's extraordinary rendition program during the hunt for al Qaeda.

Khalid al-Masri, a German-Lebanese man, living at the time in the southern German town of Neu-Ulm, was arrested on the border between Serbia and the FYR of Macedonia on December 31, 2003, only because - as was confirmed by the US Senate in 2014 - he shared a name with an al Qaeda suspect.

Macedonian authorities held him in a hotel in Skopje for three weeks before he was handed over to CIA agents, who then flew him to a secret prison in Kabul, Afghanistan, in late January 2004.

The newly released report signed off by CIA Inspector General John Helgerson in 2007 shows that he spent four months being interrogated, humiliated and mistreated, before he was eventually released in Albania in May 2004 and "clandestinely returned to Germany," as the report put it. Though the German government was informed then of his detention, according to a "Washington Post" report, the US asked it not to disclose any of the details.

Thank you.

NORWAY IRAN RELATIONS

Main Story of the Month

INTRODUCTION

In 2000 Norway finally entered the Islamic Republic of Iran. Then, the Foreign Ministry in Tehran had waited for thirty years and longer wondering why Norway with its specialized deep-water technologies had not come and helped Iran to develop the South Pars project, as well as other on -and offshore  projects in the Islamic Republic.

Assaluyeh Pars Special Energy Economi Zone

Even before the plane with its Government officials and representa-tives of the petroleum-related industries had left the Norwegian air-space, Norway had in fact already lost its unique business opportunity in the Islamic republic of Iran. These fish eating latecomers had all arrived Teheran’s Mehrabad Airport from a country which, in a radical way, distances itself from piety and where spirituality does not have any important place in the daily lives of the people. And were the word "Islam" in their nordic consciousness often is associated with terrorism and threats. The stage was now set for a humongous clash between two contradictory civilizations!



THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN

ENDGAME TEHERAN

If Justice shall have any meaning at all, it must include

the person responsible for the Crime.

 Harald Dahle-Sladek

The Editor-in-chief

From the very outset it was the twisted Norwegian mindset, the whole chain of command in Oslo and it's ill prepared bureaucracy that faulted. Right from the Parliament down through the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Ministry of Energy and Oil, INTSOK and the industry, and the medium sized oil company Statoil whose ethical bearing were out of course. Their factual relations to Iran were all seriously lagging behind and bribery and corruption were only two unpleasant sides of a larger and more complex picture. Welcome to Norway's worst diplomatic, ethical and industrial catastrophy in modern times.


Norwegians in Tehran were rapidly revealing a devastating lack of empathic feelings and an over emphasizing on cognitive thinking in general and diplomatic correctness in particular. Among Norwegian dignitaries in Oslo and Tehran the phrase "the People of Iran" was nowhere to be heard. However, from the Iranian side, having the People of Iran in focus was a prerequisite for doing business in the country. Thus, as we shall see, from the very outset Norway were on a collision course with the Islamic republic; Norway and Statoil did nothing for the People of Iran.



In the case of Norway and Statoil in Iran, the agreement between Department of Justice and Statoil did not include that person responsible for the crime. Thus, the US Department of Justice and Norway's Økokrim both failed their obligation, to indict and prosecute the head of Statoil Olav Fjell. It gives the wrongest signal possible, and that is very serious. That the medium sized Norwegian oil company Statoil can pay itself out of bribery is intollerable. And the US-based Law firm Sulliwan & Cromwell representing Statoil did a splendid job facilitating just that!



Mehdi Hashemi Rafsanjani

The decision to bribe Mehdi, the son of President Hashemi Rafsanjani was awfully bad for Norway! In the eyes of the international community it was the worst that could happen. And Norway had to pay a heavy price. The total disrespect for an ethical bearing, suddenly revealed a system that collapsed for the whole world to admire. It was really bad, and totally unnecessary.

THE NOBEL PEACE PRICE TO SHIRIN EBADIN

In the middle of the Norway bribery scandal with Iran in 2003 the Nobel Committee gave the Peace Prize to Iranian opposition lawyer Shirin Ebadin. It was not enough with one problem with Iran, Norway had to create  a second! It was also a slap in the face of President Khatami and his Dialog among Civilizations program.

A SUSTAINABLE DIALOGUE AND COMMON GROUND?

The Norwegian Nobel Committee abuses its power and use the Prize in a political context to push the agenda of the Norwegian Parliament, Stortinget. They did it with Iran in 2003 and with the Peoples Republic of China seven years later. Both instances prove that the Norwegian Parliament, the Norwegian Nobel Committee, and the Foreign Ministry in Oslo are seriously lacking in experience in their ability to create sustainable dialog and common ground in international relations. In this context it remains a mystery to us what Norway can contribute to in the UN Security Council for the common good of Mankind.



NORWAY IN THE SECURITY COUNCIL

  The return of the Emperor’s New Clothes! 

With the promises (read: bribes) of future gains for supporting a place

for itself in the UN Security Council, Norway finally got itself a hot seat.

The situation between Iran and Norway was a catastrophe, and with the Statoil bribery-case rapidly unfolding it took just another twelve months before Norway was kicked out of Iran. Shortly after in 2010, Norway detonated another diplomatic bomb, this time with China as result of naively giving Chinese opposition personality Wen Jiabao the Nobel Peace Prize. It took Norway ten years to establish a new diplomatic foothold in the Peoples Republic of China. Two of humanity’s oldest cultures, the Persian and the Chinese had in less than ten years both denied Norway access. An astonishing achieve-ment on the world diplomatic scene. 

Hans Christian Andersen

wrote The Emperors New Clothes

To compensate for this traumatic downfall, and to show the entire upper echelon of the ruling world-elite that Norway could be trusted, it set forth to conquer a chair in the Security Council. And won! The overstretched country with its microscopic population of 5.4 million fish eating Norwegians was now geared to show off its new clothes. Like the Emperor in the fairytale by H C Andersen.

Many applauded Norway, but the few who knew her better were embarrassed and lowered their sights as the Queen from the North strutted her feathers. They were not fooled. Neither are we! What Norway can contribute with in the Security Council is unclear to us, but should it be en par with her Iran and China operations, then God help us all.

 At last the Norwegian Government had decided to enter the Islamic Republic of Iran. But it's reputation and political standing were to be ruined by lack of experience in creating dialogue and common ground with the Embassy of Iran in Oslo, and a deeper understanding of doing business with Teheran. Any previous negative energy between the two sides was carefully being hidden behind a constructed façade of exuberant optimism. And then, in an instant, the scene-carpet came down.

Opening of the Parliament Stortinget, Oslo

 E mail to the Department of Justice

Department of Justice

Attention the Attorney General

From Harald Dahle-Sladek, Oslo Norway

haroldsworld@petrofilm.com

www.petrofilm.com

                                                                            Oslo, October 2nd, 2020

Dear Sir,

I am writing to you to inform you about an article that I have written on my web page www.petrofilm.com It is the main article of the month of October and bears the title “ENDGAME TEHRAN.” In it I analyze the Statoil-Iran-bribery Case. Although the Department of Justice made an agreement with Statoil (Norway), the then head of the company Olav Fjell was never indicted.

My article proves that Olav Fjell in fact was responsible for the downfall of Statoil. The information revealed in the article proves that the information given by Statoil to Department of Justice does not constitutes the whole truth and is a breach of the agreement between Statoil and the Department.

The case of Statoil in Iran did not happen as a sudden bang but came as a result of assumptions that had to be present over time. It was therefore imperative on the part of the Norwegian power apparatus to prevent access to any context in something that was of a far more serious nature than Statoil's role in isolation. The full and complete truth would have revealed the full and complete responsibility. And they were not interested in that from the Norwegian side.

Tehran’s Ambassador to Oslo His Excellency Noghrehkar Shirazi told me, “In a meeting at Statoil where Olav Fjell was present, I gave him the mobile phone number of our Minister of Oil Zanganeh. Mr. Zanganeh had said to me, that if Fjell had any question in any direction, he was free to call. But Fjell never called him, and Zanganeh thought that very strange!” And that became the end for Statoil in Iran.

I can refer to United States versus the car maker VW. Where top leaders were indicted. If Justice shall mean something it should include the person(s) responsible for the crime.

Best regards

Harald Dahle-Sladek



Norwegian Energy Partners NORWEP (INTSOK)

Owned by the Ministry of Oil, Ministry of Foreign Affairs,

the Norwegian Government and the Industry

On 10 January 2005, a meeting was held at INTSOK, Norwegian Oil and Gas Partners, in Hoffsveien 1, entrance 1A 4th floor. Present at the meeting were Knut Gulbrand Wangen, CEO of INTSOK and Harald Dahle from his own company Petroconsult. The meeting was arranged at the request of Dahle and lasted from one o'clock to about a quarter past two and a half. At the end of the meeting Mr. Wangen was deeply affected by the content and seriousness of the conver-sation. He himself expressed a certain dismay at everything Dahle had told him. 

At the meeting with Wangen on January 10, 2005, I said that even though my work was not accepted by INTSOK and by all the others, it could be worthwhile to invite me onto the carpet to hear a different facet, a different nuance than the one usually heard about Iran. Mr Wangen looked at me as he understood what I was talking about but said that such an input was not interesting. I wondered and sat back with a feeling of exclusion and little value at the same time as I understood that it was precisely such input from the side that could have brought in new knowledge and understanding. But this was not the case. Only the drawn official line was acceptable.

Representative Mr. Werner Karlsson of the Norwegian Oil and Gas Partners INTSOK to the editor-in-chief Harald Dahle-Sladek: You are not worried about human rights in Iran, are you? They take the lives of people, stone them .."

The opening of the Norway-Iran conference by INTSOK at Hotel Azadi in Tehran was a toned down and poorly presented presentation from the Norwegian side. The Norwegian minister spoke low, indistinct and did not have a friendly and positive attitude. No joy, no warmth. And no enthusiasm at all. It was a sad affair with an awfully bad audio. Embarrassing to travel so far and spend so much money and time with such a poor result. Beautiful suits probably do a lot, but far from enough.

THIS MONTH'S STORY CONTINUED. . .

THE THREE TRACKS

                                            Iran                  Norway        Petrofilm Dialoge Films         

Who agreed with whom, and who did not?

 My interests and Iran's interests coincided namely, to create dialogue and common ground and focus on the "People of Iran". A factor that was totally absent from the Norwegian side.

My interests did not coincide with the interests and perceptions of the Norwegians. I was there to create dialogue and common ground. Norway was there to make money and did not emphasize with the "People of Iran" which was a pre-requisite from the Iranian side if one   wanted to succeed in creating sustainable business in the country. Norwegian industry coincided with Iran’s but did a weak job of presenting the breadth of what Norway could offer in terms of services.

I came in from the sideline through an industrial three-national seismic project and thought it would be wise to have a round of talks in Tehran. Tehran had not experienced such attention as I gave them, and they therefore opened up all their doors to me, to Oslo's great annoyance.

It was first my dialog creating work aimed at the Iranians who came from Teheran to Oslo in 1998/99 within the three-national Persian Carpet 2000 seismic project. From North of the Persian Gulf to the Oman Sea. Six ships, lots of equipment and about one thousand people.

Then it was my "Vison of Iran" filmed interview project in 2002 in Teheran to lift up the People of Iran. The phrase "the people of Iran" was repeated over and over to me from the Iranian side, in the Foreign Ministry in Teheran. 

Then it was the Iranian Ambassador to Oslo Noghrehkar Shirazi's year-long grudge against the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs that was a separate project seen through his eyes and the Foreign Ministry in Teheran. These were two different projects, one within a seismic project, the other within diplomatic tensions between Iran and Norway.

The idea to create dialog and common ground was much the same for both tracks, but the information I received in Tehran and the usefulness and use of it were different for both. The information that Ambassador Ali Ahani gave me about the situation between Iran and Norway, for example, belonged only to the diplomatic project initiated by Ambassador to Oslo, Noghrehkar Shirazi, and myself.

The information I received from Mohammad Mohaddes in the National Iranian Oil Company NIOC about the latter announcing new exploration blocks, only belonged to the seismic project and was especially useful for Norwegian seismic company Global Geo Services in Oslo.

The Norwegian Storting, the Parliament, in principle coincided with Iran’s Parliament, Majlis. Top-level agreement.

The Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs coincided with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Tehran's view, but was charged with poor and late follow-up from Oslo over many years.

The views of the Ministers of Energy and Oil Mr. Olav Akselsen (2000) and Mr. Einar Steensnes (2003) in Oslo coincided in principle with the views of Minister of Oil Mr. Bijan Zanganeh in Teheran.

Statoil's management in Teheran, Mr. Harald Finnvik, coincided with the Ministry of Oil and NIOC, and at the same time it did not when Statoil ran its own under-the-table bribery race with Mehdi, the son of former president Hashemi Rafsanjani, who was Director for one of the NIOC companies.

My one hour talk on May 19, 2002 with Mr. Mehdi Mirmoezi, Deputy Minister of Petroleum and President of the National Iranian Oil Company NIOC, revealed that NIOC was in fact "very satisfied" with the works that Statoil's people had done so far in Iran.

A miserable presentation of Norway to the Iranian officials  in Tehran. Another miserable presentation by Deputy Minister of oil from Norway at the INTSOK opening at Azadi Hotel.

Norway probably meant it well, but presented itself amateurishly and did not mirror the Iranian culture and the greatness in the Iranian people. They not create thrust trough empathy and understood little or nothing at all. Lots of handshaking and bla-bla, but hardly any results to speak of. Talk about missing out on a huge opportunity!

  IRAN DAILY November 23, 2000

Left corner, Iran's powerful Minister of Oil Bijan Zanganeh, right corner

Minister for Energy and Oil, Norway Olav Akselsen in Teheran November 22nd 2000.

Vice President Mohammad Ali Abtahi

in April 2002, I visited my Iranian friend Mohammad Ali Abtahi in Tehran. Mohammad had been vice president to President Khatami, and he now headed the Institute for Dialog between the Religions. “The Christian God and the Islamic God is the same, one God,” Mohammad told me confidently with a smile.

Abtahi confirmed that both religions have many things in common, and that today the world needs dialog. The most important parts that are building civilizations are religions. But if every religion believes that it is the only and holy religion, we will not have dialog with other religions. Today dialog between the religions is taken very seriously and this is so because man feels that he must take special notice and care of what is common in the religions, because there is a common danger threatening the religions. The soul of the religions is spirituality, and it is being hurt in our time. This is a danger which threatens both Islam and Christianity. We have had many wars and unrest in the world, and this is also because of the lack of spirituality. Because of this the different religions need to collaborate.



Two different concepts altogether

One to make a as much money as possible in the shortest amount of time (above); the other to lift up the People of Iran and to create a sustainable dialog and common ground, Harald Dahle's book concept.

The Minister

CLICK HERE PLAY ZANGANEH

Minister of Oil Mr. Bijan Zanganeh

"I gave Fjell (CEO of STATOIL)  my mobile phone number,

but he never called me back!"

A BETRAYAL FROM THE NORWEGIAN SIDE

 "Why put money under the table,

when it should have been transfered into a nice offer

laid on the table?"

                                                                       The Editor-in-Chief

How an error in Spirit

became a Catastrophic failure in Matter.

"Isolating the case as a purely financial matter would at the same time prevent insight into the other underlying causes. Therefore, it can be said that the media largely refrained from tackling these underlying causes, and in that way played along with the scapegoat Statoil as well as with the Norwegian power apparatus." 

 The CEO

CEO of Statoil Olav Fjell is interviewed by the Norwegian

state-owned TV Channel "NRK".

Olav Fjell: We all live in a yellow submarine

DEVASTATING: STATOIL CEO OLAV FJELL, THE ONE WHO KNEW!

Norway had set its course and moved majestically through the sea like a modern cruise liner. But the Iranian waters proved to unfamiliar to navigate in and the ship headed for a disaster. But nobody on the Bridge cared.



NORWAY: DARK CLOUDS GATHERING

    Norway’s entering into the Islamic Republic of Iran in 2000 became a prelude to the worst diplomatic and industrial disaster the country had ever experienced. Only overshadowed by its nightmarish relations to Peoples Republic of China, in 2010 after the Norwegian parliament-appointed Norwegian Nobel Committee awarded the Peace prize to  Chinese human rights activist Liu Xiaobo. In both cases Norway used its check-book diplomacy to crawl back and normalize its relations. To make oneself unpopular with two of the oldest civilations on the planet in less than ten years is quite an achievement in itself!

FROM THE PARLIAMENT DOWN

    At last the Norwegian Government had decided to enter the Islamic Republic of Iran. But it's reputation and political standing were to be ruined by lack of experience in creating dialogue and common ground with the Embassy of Iran in Oslo, and a deeper understanding of doing business with Teheran. Any previous negative energy between the two sides was carefully being hidden behind a constructed façade of exuberant optimism. And then, in an instant, the scene-carpet came down.

ZANGANEH'S MOBILE PHONE NUMBER

    During a good-bye reception at the Iranian Embassy in March 2004, just months before ending his four-year period as Ambassador and leaving Oslo for Teheran, Ambassador Noghrehkar Shirazi revealed to the Editor-in-Chief Harald Dahle the following.

Shirazi:

"During a meeting that was held at the Statoil headquarter, I conveyed a message to Olav Fjell from our Minister of Oil Mr. Zanganeh. Zanganeh had instructed me to say that if Fjell had a question, ore problem, he could just phone him on his mobile phone. So, I gave Olav Fjell the mobile phone number Zanganeh had given me, but Fjell never called him back. The problems which Statoil had could easily have been cleaned out with Zanganeh over the phone, but there was no sign from Statoil and Zanganeh found this very odd!"

    It is worth commenting that at the time when Bijan Zanganeh instructed Ambassador Shirazi to give CEO Olav Fjell his private mobile phone number, he was already aware of Statoil's under-the-table operations with son of president Hashemi Rafsanjani. This is the impression that Harald Dahle got from Shirazi in March 2004.

STATOIL'S BETRAYAL AND DOUBLE-CROSSINGS

    In other words, if Statoil had a problem, any problem, - and as CEO of the company Olav Fjell would have known - he could easily have talked these matters over with Iran's powerful Minister of oil Mr. Bijan Zanganeh, but strangely enough he did not do that. The Ministry of Oil and the National Iranian Oil Company took this as a betrayal.

    Statoil had doubled crossed not only Tehran's powerful Minister of Oil Bijan Zanganeh, but also their own representative in Iran Mr. Harald Finnvik who knew nothing about the home offices bizarre under-the-table deals. And it quickly became the end for Statoil in Iran. The problems for Statoil in Iran only increased after that.

TEHERAN: STATOIL EMPLYEES ON THE OUTSIDE

    Said during the INTSOK Gardermoen Airport Conference Center gathering in February 2002 which Harald Dahle-Sladek attended:

Director Arne Eriksen, Statoil,

"As you can see, I am very frustrated. The Iranians are polite towards us (in Tehran), but we have a distinct impression of being kept on the "outside" of things...and it is a question for how long this can go on before we have to pull out altogether."

Harald Dahle-Sladek, Petrofilm,

"I suggested to Statoil's Arne Eriksen (who was in Tehran) on the phone that I was willing to negotiate with the Iranians for a better understanding between the two sides.

But, after consulting with his people Eriksen came back and said that it was of no interest to them.

I found their decision remarkably devoid of initiative and empathy; they simply did not fathom how to treat their Iranian counterpart." 

INTSOK - Norwegian Oil and Gas Partners, is a Norwegian organization owned jointly by the Ministry of Energy and Oil, The Ministry of Foreign Affairs and about 100 of Norways largest, medium sized and small industrial companies for the purpose of helping and guiding these companies into foreign countries, under the umbrella of Norway's politics and regulations. Between 2000 and 2003 the Export Council of Norway was also involved.

RESPONSIBILITY WAS HEAVIEST AT THE TOP

    It was also incumbent of the Norwegian authorities to isolate the damage by acquitting the actual head of Statoil, Olav Fjell in order in this way, to quickly direct the responsibility downwards in the organi-zation and not upwards. The State acquitted itself, and the first to "be sanitized" was the Statoil CEO Olav Fjell himself.

    Norway's catastrophic involvement in the Islamic Republic of Iran between 2000 and 2003 is a good example of what I will describe as a vertical system collapse. The Oslo-Tehran-Statoil collapse did not spread in a horizontal direction, but was shaped like a wedge with the tip down. The relationship of responsibility was clearly heaviest at the top, which is the opposite conclusion that was drawn by the collective Norwegian  media elite at the time.

The Foreign Department, Oslo

 NORWAY-IRAN FOREIGN POLITICS

"It was in fact the Norwegian foreign politics versus Iran in

the thirty odd years preceding 2000 that created the

groundwork for a future conflict between

the two sides, in 2003." The Editor-in-Cief

Teheran's Ambassador to Oslo Mr. Noghrehkar Shirazi

to the Editor-in-Chief Harald Dahle:

"The Norwegian Foreign Department and the others see that you run fast and reach high levels in Tehran, and it irritates them!

My be, many years ago they should have done the works

you have been doing now!"



Ministry of Foreign Affairs Oslo: Created the ground work for future conflict.



A SYSTEM COLLAPSE FROM THE PARLIAMENT AND DOWN

    The STATOIL bribery case with Iran was a System collapse from the Norwegian Parliament, down through the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Oslo; INTSOK, the Export Council, and STATOIL. It was incumbent on the Norwegian State to isolate the damage by acquitting the actual head of Statoil, the person who knew everything, Olav Fjell in order in this way to quickly direct the responsibility downwards in the organizationand not upwards.



A FOREIGN POLITICS ON BOTH SIDES OF THE STREET

     Statoil needed to expand its area of operations abroad  and were indeed welcomed by Iran's Minister of Oil Bijan Zanganeh. However, with regards to the Islamic Republic of Iran, the Foreign Ministry in Oslo had for thirty years and longer been walking on both sides of the street and cultivated contacts with opposition group like the Mujahed-din Kalk MEK - in the eyes of Tehran a Terrorist Organization - as well as with other enemies of Tehran.

    It was in fact the Norwegian foreign politics versus Iran in the thirty odd years preceding 2000 that created the ground-work for a future conflict between the two sides, in 2003. Read my interview from the Foreign Ministry Tehran with Ambassador Ali Ahani who confirms that this was the case: "Norway was lagging behind compared to other European countries."

TEHERAN: NORWAY DID NOT HAVE A GOOD STANDING

    But, unfortunately the situation between the two sides where such between 2000 (when Statoil entered Tehran) and in 2002 (when I spoke to Ambassador Ali Ahani and Ambassador Hossein Adeli in the Foreign Ministry in Tehran) that Norway in reality did not have a particularly good standing there.

    This somber reality  had made it somewhat problematic for Statoil. Therefore, it became tempting for Olav Fjell and his entourage to make a short-cut to the son of President Hashemi Rafsanjani and to use unconventional and criminal methods to try to secure work for Statoil at the National Iranian Oil Company NIOC. Statoil was now flying blind, and as we shall witness an implotion of dimentions was not far away in time.

THE CAPTAIN DERAILED THE PROJECT BEFORE START

    At the helm of Norways flagship stood Statoil's canonized Saint Olav Fjell, a man with semingly supernatural capability to survive in his position as CEO supported by an almost blindfolded Statoil-board. After having brought Statoils name down in the gutter and tainted Norway's flagship and reputation for the world to admire, this semingly untouchable man walked straight into  a new and high-paid job soon thereafter.

    It was his responsibility to implement Statoil's Iran strategy - his strategy - and to see it through. But, he did not understand that he had in fact already derailed the entire Statoil-goes-to-Iran operation. With no ethical and empathical bearings, CEO Olav Fjell continued the doomed and misguided plan like a drunk captain onboard a sinking ship. Where was his helpers? Ore my be they were all drunk?

OLAV FJELL: NOT A SINGLE WORD OF CRITICISM

Off course, Fjell should have known, because it was his duty to know and to understand. That is why he had a very high salary; but he didn't. In the meantime bribe-money was now flowing out of Statoil like water over the Niagara Falls! Mr. Saint Olav did not mind. After all it was not his money, but the taxpayers!

    In the following years not a word of criticism was raised against him. In the papers of Statoil's law firm Sullivan & Cromwell LLP in Washington and New York not a single letter was mentioned regarding Olav Fjell. In fact, he was nowhere to be found.

    Statoil's new clearing boy Helge Lund signed the court paper for Statoil. And at that time Mr. Olav "untouchable" Fjell was far away over the shimmering horizon. However, the full and complete truth would have revealed the full and complete responsibility. But, they were not interested in the truth from the Norwegian side! Only to get off the hook of the US Justice Department and to close the case as quickly as possible so the dust could settle once and for all.   

    In the meantime, among the ruling elite of Norway, Mr Olav "untouchable" Fjell was regarded as a near folk hero and could chose any high-ranking position he wished for; all door were opened up to him. He had after all been pardoned by the State, sanitized as it were and made trustworthy again.

MULTIPLE HUMAN ERRORS AS SYSTEM COLLAPSES

    It is not one thing alone that triggers an accident, but the sum of many factors. This can be done with technical equipment as well as with a company or a state apparatus. System collapse is a good term when an electrical network - power grid - fails, but the term can just as well be used about Norway's entry into Iran where Norway's flagship Statoil was responsible for a failure of dimensions. The media isolated this incident as an economic affair - a corruption case.

 A DOWNWARD DEFLECTION AND A NEGATIVE TREND

    The truth is probably more that there were many other and different factors that were not of an economic nature that helped to trigger the catastrophe (downward deflection) These factors were such that a breakdown in the diplomatic relations between the two countries could only happen when these factors were present.

    Isolating the case as a purely financial matter will at the same time prevent insight into the other underlying causes. Therefore, it can be said that the media largely refrained from tackling these underlying causes, and in that way played along with the scapegoat Statoil, it's CEO Olav Fjell, as well as with the Norwegian Power Apparatus.

OBJECTIVE #1: TO PREVENT ACCESS TO THE TRUTH

    The case of Norway and Statoil in Iran did not happen as a sudden bang but came as a result of a bunch of assumptions that had to be present over time.

    It was therefore imperative on the part of the power apparatus (the State, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Ministry of Petroleum and Energy, INTSOK and industry) to prevent access to any context in something that was of a far more serious nature than Statoil's role in isolation.

OBJECTIVE #2: THREATS AND HARASSMENTS

    The full and complete truth would have revealed the full and complete responsibility. And they were not interested in that from the Norwegian side.  It therefore became imperative to isolate the Editor-in-Chief Mr. Harald Dahle-Sladek with ice cold harassment and threats. Access was undesirable, and pressure was applied on him from every angle over twenty years. The Norwegian power apparatus was a closed circuit. So, they believed! 

A comment from the Editor-in-Chief

Petrofilm.com located in Oslo has in its possession several hundred times more material on Norway-Iran relations than is documented here. This includes E mails, letters, and writings. Some of that material is in nature revealing and unpleasant.

WORKING FIVE YEARS IN TEHERAN

AND IN THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN

Vision of Iran Dialogue Film by Harald Dahle-Sladek (short version)

 CLICK AND PLAY VIDEO

Working card in Iran for the Editor-in-Chief Harald Dahle-Sladek

SEAL OF THE FOREIGN MINISTRY

THE FOREIGN MINISTRY TEHERAN

NORWAY-IRAN RELATIONS REVEALED

Teheran, on the premises of the Foreign Ministry. April 2002: The Editor-in-Chief Harald Dahle-Sladek hurries back on United Nations Street after completing a filmed interview with Deputy Foreign Minister for Economic Affairs Dr. Hossein Adeli in his office. "They invitet me into the Lion's den and told me more than I could have imagined; but it came at a price!"

CLICK PICTURE PLAY VIDEO

Adeli: Difficulties should be settled as a non-armed conflict

SEYED MOHAMMAD HOSSEIN ADELI PhD

    In April 2002 and in May 2003 I had several meetings in the Foreign Ministry in Tehran. There I met with Dr. Hossein Adeli, Deputy Foreign Minister for Economic Affairs who was busy, but was very generous and took time off to talk with me. Adeli’s diplomatic career progressed through his appointment as Iranian Ambassador to Canada in 1995.

At the end of his term in 1999, Adeli was nominated as Deputy Foreign Minister for Economic Affairs and the chairman of the Coordinating Council for Foreign Economic Relations until 2004. During these years, Adeli initiated two special committees for Reconstruction of Afghanistan and Reconstruction of Iraq through a series of multilateral arrangements, and filled the role of Secretary General for both committees.

As his last official post, he served as Ambassador Extraordinary Pleni-potentiary of Iran to the United Kingdom. At his time, he along with John Curtis and several others lobbied with Iranian Government to borrow 80 items for a new exhibition named "The Forgotten Empire".



 AMBASSADOR ALI AHANI

NORWAY WAS ONE OF THE LAST COUNTRIES IN EUROPE  TO ESTABLISH GOOD AND SUSTAINABLE TIES WITH THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN

     It so happened, that during my dialogue with Dr. Ahani, the tendon curtain between Norway and Iran suddenly went up. I did not ask for it to happen. Dr. Ahani freely and unrestrained opened up the entire relationship between the two countries, which to put it mildly, was a basket full of rotten eggs. Here is a short version of what Dr. Ahani told me in that meeting in the Foreign Ministry in Tehran on April 7, 2002.

    Ambassador to Europe and America, the present Ambassador to Paris, the sencond time, His Excellency Ali Ahani and Harald Dahle-Sladek in Dr. Ahani's office in the Foreign Ministry Tehran, April 2002. Dr. Ahani left, with Harald Dahle-Sladek, right in Ahani's office.

Picture below from the video during the interview. From Left, the translator, Ambassador Ali Ahani and Editor-in-Chief Harald Dahle-Sladek. (C)2002 Harald Dahle Oslo.

Too much, Too late, Too dumb!

In 2000 Norway finally entered the Islamic Republic of Iran. Then, the Foreign Ministry in Tehran had waited for thirty years and longer wondering why Norway with its specialized deep-water technologies had not come and helped Iran to build the South Pars project as well as other onshore and offshore  projects.

    When I arrived the Foreign Department in Tehran in April 2002 the mood was somber, to say the least. Ambassador Ali Ahani was irritated. The Norwegian Foreign Department had for thirty years played on "both sides of the street" cultivating contacts with opposition groups to Iran, like the Mujahidin Kalk MEK. The attitude from the Norwegians had been cordial, but stiff and had not reflected the greatness in the Iranian culture and its people. Tehran was very hurt.

Dahle: -With regards to Norway and Iran relations Ambassador Ahani, I notice some slight irritation on your part, why is that?

Ali-Ahani: -In fact, the Islamic Republic of Iran and Norway have many opportunities. In addition to the economic and industrial cooperation we have oil and gas. I would like to emphasize the importance for us to finalize the oil and gas projects in the South along the Persian Gulf, as well as in the Caspian Sea. Norway and Iran are two important oil producing countries and can cooperate and coordination in the world oil market and stabilize oil prices, which would be in the interest of both oil producers and oil consumers.

Dahle: -You mentioned that the Norwegian Foreign Minister Jan Pettersen's visit to Tehran was a kind of watershed. Could you please explain that?

Ali-Ahani: In fact, in the past years, our relations lacked the sufficient momentum to further expand our relations. And in fact, compared to other countries in Europe, our relations with Norway were lagging behind. The visit of your Foreign Minister to Tehran show the firm determination of your country for the expansion of the relations with Iran. And certainly, there is such a political will and enthusiasm on the part of the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran!

Dahle: -Thank you Dr. Ahani.



 THE ROLE OF PETROFILM

IN THE PERSIAN GULF

CLICK PICTURE PLAY VIDEO

PC2000 shooting seismic at Hendijan North of the Persian Gulf

Kish Island

Kish Free Trade Island Iran. Iran's Economic Zone,  March 2000 Harald Dahle left with representatives of Iranian Industries at the University of Kish for  a large Exhibition.

HARALD DAHLE'S "VISION OF IRAN" DIALOGUE FILMS

    I created Dialogue and Common ground with the People of Iran over five years, and that became a huge problem for the official Norway. They saw it as an act of treason and started a war of harassment and badmouthing. However, looking at their results it was then that I learned the hard way how mediocre, narrow minded and unprofessional the Norwegians were.

    With regards to Iran I came in from the side through a three-national industrial project between Norway, the Islamic Republic of Iran and People's Republic of China. The objective was to map the entire coast of Iran from North of the Persian Gulf (at Hendijan) to the Oman Sea (near the border of Pakistan) with six seismic vessels over three years. The name of the project was Persian Carpet 2000, or PC2000 for short.

    I first had relations building with the eleven Iranians who came to Oslo for the project in November 1997, Later I documented the entire project from day one in January 1998 and sent reports back to Oslo from Iran and Dubai.

    In 2001 I suggested to the Norwegian company which had contracts with Iran, that it could be greatly beneficial to have a round of dialogue talks in Tehran and listen to what they had to say there. I was of the opinion that without doing that, the project would fly blind, because there were so many unknown factors that we did not know about at the time. This strategy proved to be very advantageous to both sides.

    I presented my idea to the Deputy Head of the Iranian Diplomatic Mission in Oslo, His Excellency Rezvani, who presented it to Ambassador Noghrehkar Shirazi. I wanted to make a round of filmed interviews with the leaders of Iran under the umbrella "Vision of Iran". Ten days later they OK'd the project and all doors in Iran was opened up to me.

    Actually, I started in Dubai to prepare myself for this job, and then moved to the Iranian Kish Island some forty minutes by Kish Air from Dubai. There I visited the French oil compnay TOTAL and attended two seminars and exhibitions at the University of Kish.

    All the time I worked on a platform of Empathy, Respect and Dignity.

I was not in the Diplomatic business but created Dialogue and Common ground  with respect for the People of Iran and their outstanding Culture. That was my platform from which I had talks in Tehran and elsewhere. On May 19 2002 I completed the Vision of Iran dialogue talks in Tehran and flew back to Dubai. I left Dubai for Oslo one month later. In May 2003 I returnet to Teheran for the last time.

    My simple and honest idea became a huge burden to the official Norway, in such a disasterous way that high-level Iranian dignitaries became uneasy and shook teir heads in dismay. 

    Deputy Foreign Minister for Economic Affairs Dr. Hossein Adeli in the Foreign Ministry in Teheran expressed gratitude for my work and told me, "When Harald Finnvik from Statoil Teheran visits me, I speak highly about the work that you do. Dr. Adeli was a great support to me in another vice tense situation.

STATOIL WAS READY TO THROW IN THE TOWEL AND GIVE IN

 Engaged US Law Firm

Sullivan & Cromwell  LLP

1701 Pennsylvania Ave. N.W. Washington/125 Broad Street New York N.Y

         WIERSHOLM  AS              SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP

          Anders Chr. Ryssdal           Margaret K. Pfeiffer           Samuel W. Seymour



    On August 20, 2004 at noon, a meeting was held in Oslo at the distin-guished Law firm WIERSHOLM where Harald Dahle-Sladek was present. He was asked by Senior Partner Anders Ryssdal to attend because Dahle, according to Ryssdal "knew much about Iran." Dahle arrived in Iran early January 1998, eighteen months before Norway entered the country in early 2000.

    At the time of the Wiersholm meeting Harald Dahle had already worked seven years on Iran. The same year in 2004, Dahle gave his works on Iran to the Library of the Norwegian Nobel Institute in Oslo. Harald Dahle also had filmed interviews with the upper crust of the Iranian establishment, from the Presidents office to the Foreign Ministry and various organizations and companies.

    Through the filmed interviews that Harald Dahle had made in Tehran the lawyers Margaret K. Pfeiffer from the Washington Office and Samuel W. Seymour from the New York Office could both watch and hear directly from dignitaries in Tehran. To bring out high-level talks from Tehran which Dahle did was in itself unique.

Harald Dahle talks to Vice President Mohammad Ali Abtahi

Meeting at Law firm Wiersholm, Oslo

    During the meeting on August 20. 2004, Margareth K. Pfeiffer asked Harald Dahle to join Sulivan & Cromwell LLP for the STATOIL defence and get paid. He answered politely that he would have to think that proposal over. Both US lawyers were impressed by the material Harald Dahle had brought to the meeting.

     From law firm Wiersholm attended Anders Rysdal and Stefan Jervel. From STATOIL's Juridical Department came Odd Sollesnes; Head of Statoils Juridical Department Jacob S Middelton refrained. From Sullivan & Cromwel attended Margaret K Pfeiffer and Samuel W Seymour. Harald Dahle from Petrofilm attended.

The National Iranian Oil Company NIOC, May 27, 2003

FINAL METING ON MINISTER LEVEL IN TEHRAN 

Right side Iran, from right to left: Chief of Protocol, female speaker, Minister of Oil Zanganeh, Ambassador to Oslo Noghrehkar Shirazi with glasses. Left side Norway, number seven with glasses Minister of Energy and Oil Einar Steensnes. (C)2003 Harald Dahle-Sladek 

                                               Seal of the National Iranian Oil Company

The National Iranian Oil Company NIOC, Tehran

15th Executive Floor, May 19, 2002. Deputy Minister of Oil and President of the National Iranian Oil Company NIOC, His Excellency Mehdi Mirmoezi, right, with Editor-in-Chief Harald Dahle-Sladek from Oslo, left after a one hour filmed interview. Mirmoezi, "We are very satisfied with the works done by Statoil here in Iran." Statoil's betrayal of Ministry of Oil and NIOC did not happen from Tehran, but from Oslo and Stavanger. On July 19, 2006 at 8PM I called Director Arne Eriksen in Statoil from Oslo. He was in Tehran in a Statoil meeting and sounded worried. I said to him that I was willing to negotiate for Statoil. He was surprices, but interested. He admitted that the situation was very problematic. Later at a meeting in Oslo he said,

"As you can see, I am very frustrated. The Iranians are polite towards us (in Tehran), but we have a distinct impression of being kept on the "outside" of things...and it is a question for how long this can go on before we have to pull out altogether."

THE BEGINNING OF THE END

    Tehran May 2003: Minister for Energy and Oil His Excellency Einar Steensnes, Norway (left) and Minister of Oil, His Excellency Namdahr Zangeneh, Iran, on their way from the plenum meeting Norway-Iran towards a more private setting on the 15th Executive Floor at the Headquarter of the National Iranian Oil Company NIOC, Tehran. Behind Steensnes walks Zangenehs body guard Mr Amiri, and behind him Tehran's Ambassador to Oslo, His Excelleny Noghrehkar Shirazi. Photo by Harald Dahle.

Ambassador to Oslo, His Excellency Noghrehkar Shirazi is seen here leaving the National Iranian Oil Company NIOC Headquarter in Tehran on May 27, 2003, after the completion of the last meeting on Minister level between Norway and Iran. Photo: (C)2003 Harald Dahle-Sladek Petrofilm

  THE LAST SUPPER

Tehran May 2003 National Iranian Oil Company. The last meeting between Iran (left) and Norway (right) on Minister level, before Norway was kicked out. Photo (C) 2003 Harald Dahle-Sladek



    Harald Dahle-Sladek was working in the Islamic Republic of Iran from January 1998 till May 2003. His responsibility was to create dialogue and common ground with Iran on behalf of an industrial three-National seismic consortium between People Republic of China, the Islamic Republic of Iran and Norway. He did not represent the Norwegian Government or the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Oslo.

    In April 2004 Dahle gave much of his works on Norway and Iran to the library of the Norwegian Nobel Institute and in 2007 he met with President Mahmoud Amedinejads Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki in Oslo Military Society. Dahle-Sladek has more than twenty years research on Norway-Iran relations.

Harald Dahle, "I met Harald Finnvik in Tehran on several ocations.

He invited me up to the Statoil office, a nice-looking place which Statoil had rented. I had the best impression of Mr. Finnvik, and when he said he did not know about the wheeling and dealing that Statoil had done, I believed him."



General Manager for Norwegian Oil Company STATOIL in Iran Harald Finnvik seen here in ta talk with one representative for the Norwegian supply industry to the oil sector in a pause during the last Minister meeting between Norway and in Iran held at the National Iranian Oil Company NIOC in Tehran May 2003. Mr Finnvik is holding a CD in his right hand which contains filmed interviews from Petrofilm's Harald Dahle. Photo (C)2003 Harald Dahle-Sladek

Photo (C)2007 Harald Dahle-Sladek

    An example of this was when Aftenposten, Norway's largest and most influential newspaper, failed to take an interview with Harald Dahle-Sladek who had seen the whole affair with Norway in Iran as a whole and therefore could bring to light many underlying factors unknown to most. Dahle,

"They invited me for a nice lunch and listened to what I had to say. But I understood that these clowns did not possess what was needed to empathically understand what had really happened. So, nothing substantive came out of it."

The Iranian Embassy Oslo

Heart sick Ambasador rushed to hospital

However, when the Iranian Embassy in Oslo was attacked by an opposition group to Tehran and Ambassador Noghrehkar Shiraz fell ill, Aftenposten was quick to be there and put him on the front page.

The Police: Just like a father would treat his daughter!

    Deputy Head of Mission at the Iranian Embassy, His Excellency Mr. Rezvani to the Editor-in-Chief,

"The police came. One put his arm around the shoulder of a female protester, just like a father would do to his daughter. It was laughable the way the Oslo Police treated the aggressive protesters; they almost succeeded in breaking through our front entrance door."



Petropars Ltd. Tehran: The South Pars Field

Petropars Ltd Tehran April 2002. Left, President of Petropars Mr. A Turkan and Harald Dahle-Slade (right) The meeting took place three days before Mr Turkan was to leave for Oslo with the purpose to sign a contract with Statoil regarding Phase 6, 7 and 8 of the South Pars Oil and Gas Field which Iran shares with Qatar. Photo (C)2002 Harald Dahle-Sladek.

Kish Island Iran, The Persian Gulf, 2000

TOTAL: The Editor-in-Chief interviews representative of the French oil gigant TOTAL at their logistic base on Kish Island in the Persian Gulf. When US sanctions started to bite, TOTAL endet it's operations in Iran.

     Revolutionary Icon Khomeini, Leader Khamenei

President Khatami

1997-2005

THE IRANIAN EMBASSY IN OSLO

  From right to left: Tehrans Ambassador to Oslo, His Excellency Noghrehkar Shirazi; at center His Excellency Ambassador Ali Ahani (interviewed by Dahle in the Foreign Ministry in Tehran April 2000) and left, Editor-in-Chief Harald Dahle, pictured in the Iranian Embassy Oslo, October 2003,

Ambassador Noghrehkar Shirazi to Editor-in-Chief Harald Dahle:

"The Norwegian Foreign Department and the others see that you run fast and reach high levels in Tehran, and it irritates them! My be many years ago, they should have done the works you have been doing now!"

The Editor-in-Chief Harald Dahle left with His Excellency Ambassador Ali Ahani center, and Ambassador to Oslo His Excellency Noghrehkar Shirazi (holding a Petrofilm DVD in his left hand containing Dahles filmed interviews from Tehran) Seen here in the reception room at the Iranian Embassy Oslo, October 2003.

 Tehran Oil and Gas Exhibition 2002

"Statoil spent money as if it was water! They gave out millions of Dollars in bribes to a foreign country, but would not pay for a litle service rendered to them by one of their own countrymen. It is pathetik in extreme!"

                                                                                   The Editor-in-Chief

 IN THE GREACY STATOIL-CULTURE

 OF LIES AND DECEPTION

  an agreement based on a firm handshake and

  an honest word ment nothing

    April 2002: Mr. Lars Gunnar Dahle of Statoil Norway asked us at Hotel Azadi in Tehran where we stayed if we could film the Statoil stand at the Oil and Gas Exhibition in Tehran. Mr. Gunnar Dahle was the person in Statoil responsible for setting up Exhibitions. We so did, and after arriving at our base at Hotel LeMeridien Airport Rd in Dubai sometimes later, we sent the finnished product via DHL Courier to Statoil's Headquarter at Forusbeen 50 in Stavanger.

 Click picture and Play

Statoil video from Oil and Gas Exhibition Tehran 2002, made by Petrofilm

Later, back in Oslo, we sent Statoil a modest request for payment of the DHL Courier service and work. After the 2006 agreement between Statoil and the Department of Justice, Statoil dragged it's feets and would not admit to giving us the job, because as they proclaimed, "That there is no contractual basis for the work." Which is dishonesty presented as a legality. This is the answer we received from Statoil:

Petroconsult

Harald Jan Dahle

We refer to your claim with various attachments dated 22 October 2008

to Helge Lund.

Based on the information in your letter with attachments, we have carried out a further investigation internally in relation to your demand for payment. After this review, we have concluded that there is no contractual basis for your claim for payment.

Based on this, we unfortunately have to reject your claim

in the letter of 22 October 2008.

With best regards

StatoilHydro ASA

Michael Price

Original letter

STATOIL film from Tehran Oil and Gas Exhibition sent from Dubai.

Cash Payment of Dirham 207.- paid by us, equals NOK 528.-

NORWAY'S MINISTRY OF ENERGY AND OIL

    That's what friends are fore: Minister of Energy and Oil Norway, His Excellency Einar Steensnes, left, receives a DVD containing filmed interviews from Harald Dahle-Sladek which he did in Tehran in April and May, 2002.

Smiles and handshakes before curtain fall, June 2003

 PETROFILM

VISION OF IRAN

 DIALOGUE INTERVIEWS FROM TEHRAN

Click Picture Play Video

DVD Cover

The Mustazafan Foundation

of the Islamic Revolution

I was invited to the largest charitable Foundation in the Middle East, The Mustzafan Foundation of the Islamic Revolution (MJF) Their headquarter is in the former buildings of Hotel Hilton in Tehran.

The Mustazafan and Janbazan Foundation, MJF has is a huge conglome-ration of industries, from road and dam building, charitable work for the people of the Iraq war, research, manufacturing and hotels.

From left to right Editor-in-Chief Harald Dahle-Sladek , Contracts Director Reza Shaeri and representatives of MJF. At the time I worked in Iran 1998-2003, in the Precidency of Mohammad Khatami, , there was no US sanctions towards Iran.

EPITAPH

    The collapse did not spread in a horizontal direction, but was shaped like a wedge with the tip down. The relationship of responsibility was clearly heaviest at the top, which is the opposite conclusion that was drawn by the collective Norwegian  media elite at the time.

    It is a Norwegian tradition that a high-ranking CEO does not really loses his or her job, but is merely given the opportunity to start-up in a new high-ranking position shortly thereafter. The "Old Boys Club" certainly knows how to take care of its own!

Agreement between

Department of Justice and STATOIL ASA Norway

Department of Justice, USA

Law firm SULLIVAN & CROMWELL, USA

Law firm WIERSHOLM, Norway

STATOIL ASA Norway

The Persian Carpet 2000

SEISMIK PROJECT FROM NORTH OF THE PERSIAN GULF TO THE OMAN SEA

  I.R. Iran January 1998-May 2003

Click picture Play video

Harald Dahle, Transition Zone-1, Hendijan Iran Seismic shooting year 2000

Six seismic vessels attended. These were,

                                             From China: Bin Hai 504

                   Bin Hai 517

               Hai Shi-1

                                                 From Iran: Pejwak

                                          From Norway: Odin Explorer

                                                                     Geo Mariner

Picure above and below: Islamic Republic of Iran, Hendijan North of the Persian Gulf, February 2000, shooting seismic in Transition Zone 1, Chinese vehicle, Harald Dahle-Sladek has lunch on the side, pre-made food from the Chinese mother ship Bin hai 504. Below, a salvo of two kilo explosives on ten meeters deep in the sand goes off. Harald Dahle-Sladek on a safe distance, up in the right corner.

Between 1998 and 2003 Dahle held dialogue talks in Tehran on behalf of a three-national seismic project between Norway, Iran and China. He did not represent the Norwegian Foreign Department or the Government, but only the three industrial participants who together shot seismic from North of the Persian Gulf into the Oman Sea near border of Pakistan.

Picture below: Chinese seismic mother ship Bin Hai 504 (blue color) with source boat Hi Shi-1 (red color) in the persian Gulf, Iranian side, near Hendijan April 2000. Frame grab by Harald Dahle-Sladek.

Chinese Seismic Vessels Bin Hai 504 and Hi Shi 1

Frame grab by Harald Dahle

Six ships, two Norwegian, three Chinese and one Iranian did the job on time. The Iranians were very forthcoming, and I held meetings on high levels, in the Foreign Ministry, in the Oil Ministry, in the National Iranian Oil Company NIOC and on Government level, and in many other places.

Norwegian Seismic Vessel MS Geo Mariner in Iranian Waters

The PC2000 Seismic Project. Frame grab by Harald Dahle

 NEVILLE AT CAPITOL HILL

THE DESTRUCTIVE FORCE OF

THE AMERICAN PARTITOCRACY

He came, went, and lost. Gravely misunderstanding his oppo-nent’s narrative, naively showing off a piece of paper which had the support of the parties and his Government. People rejoiced little Adolf's signature. Surrounded by the masses, Prime Minister Chamberlain appeared confident indeed!

A deal was reached on 29 September, and at about 1:30 a.m. on 30 September 1938, Adolf Hitler, Neville Chamberlain, Benito Mussolini and Édouard Daladier signed the Munich Agreement. On 30 September, upon his return to Britain, Chamberlain delivered his controversial "peace for our time" speech to crowds in London.

With a typical laid-back self-reassuring British flair, the parties had for years argued back and forth weather little Adolf on the other side of the secure Channel was worth taking seriously. And in the meantime, little Adolf released a few tricks himself, he had hidden upon his sleeves; a provocative gesture here, a threat there. Never mind that, the parties said, we have enough Port to ride off that. The dictatorship of the self-reassuring, democratic partitocracy was in swing! The very safety valve which Democracy was dependent on, failed to open. And as a result, thousand of Londoners perished in flames, and all hell brought lose. Neville’s ghost!

He came, stayed, and lost. Gravely misunderstanding his oppo-nents narrative, naively showing off his ball-cap with the inflammatory message, “Make America Great Again”. The masses rejoiced! On the Capitol Hill, Tom and Nancy, Chuck, and Mitch meant it well; with paper in hand each side proclaimed a moment of victory, futile as it was. Nine days after the Capitol was nearly burned down to the ground, these same representatives of the United States self-proclaimed, dysfunctional Democracy are still debating what to do with little Adolf, who just might have another trick hidden upon his sleeves. We have no guarantee that he has not.

Capitol Hill, the very safety valve which the Democracy of the United States is dependent on has not opened. It imploded. Neville’s shadow again! The German-Swiss psychiatrist and philosopher Karl Jaspers once uttered, “If it has happened once, it can happen again. To forget it guilt.”

In these desperate days, when we failed Democracy, we know for certain that it did happen again! You can’t blame little Adolf. It was the system that failed, Tom and Nancy, Chuck, and Mitch. Every one of them held up a piece of signed paper in their hands. And with it, brought Capitol down. Little Adolf will disappear, and Capitol must be rebuilt from the inside out. Ore, we might all go down in flames!



The Stealthy Civil War OF

  the United States

 Polarization of the American society has become more evident under president Donald J Trump.

Dear friends and readers!

We have become aware of the violent culture underpinning American politics of today, even though such incidents are usually not acknowledged or reported, but often repressed and denied. The outcome of the first American civil war fought from 1861 to 1865 decided who should be included in the winner’s club and steer the new nation into the future.

HISTORY REPEATS ITSELF

The second American civil war, which is fought in our own time by stealth, is deciding who shall not be included in the winner’s club. It is against these two contradictory scenarios that many of the violent political deaths that has occurred in the United States speak more clearly to us, stand out in a way we have not realized before and warn us.

Stay vigilant folks. Help fight terrorism, domestic and foreign. Report suspicious incidents to the authorities. Have a blessed day, cheers!



FASCISM IN AMERICA

"That which has happened is a warning!"

Karl Jaspers

"To forget it is guilt. It must be continually remembered. It was possible for this to happen. And it remains possible for it to happen again at any minute. Only in knowledge can it be prevented." 

Karl Theodor Jaspers German, Born 23 February 1883, passed away on  26 February 1969, was a German-Swiss psychiatrist and philo-sopher who had a strong influence on modern theology psychiatry, and philosophy. After being trained in and practicing psychiatry, Jaspers turned to philosophical inquiry and attempted to discover an innovative philosophical system. He was often viewed as a major exponent of existentialism in Germany, though he did not accept the label.



 The Definition of Aristocracy

The original meaning of the word aristocracy simply referred to 'the rule of the best'. Aristos, the Greek word for best, implied the ‘most fitting or best suited’, while kratos referred to rule or power. This early definition described only the characteristics of suitability and gover-nance, with no relation to class or wealth.

European Aristocracy, Adriaan de Lelie, the family of Jan van Loon, 1786

Norwegian Mediocracy

State-led policy of Philosophy with direct Anti-human traits. Fear of Aristocracy and the upper Class led to rhetorical absurdity wrapped in cuddly talk. 



The Norwegian way of creating dialogue and common ground is to understand everything in death, then minimize what has been said and reflect it back as an unworthy nothing. Because in Norway you should neither be anything nor get confirmation that what you say is worth something. Out of the State's vision of social equality, an intel-lectual underclass has been created.

The Norwegian way of talking to another person is done with the rude "you" (German: Du) "You" has become a rhetorical free pass that allows the user to cross personal boundaries without paying the slightest consideration. In this way, the person can in the most obvious way step into another person's most personal areas and utilize this; right of use and property rights included. The form of accusation "you" seems to add to intimacy, but it is in its character completely superficial. One wants to give the impression of psycho-logical closeness, and it can be used to manipulate the person being talked to.

Saying "you" is dehumanizing and without dignity. Lack of real dignity and respect are two factors that clarify Norwegians' relationship with each other. Superficial, sort of commitment wrapped in "you" is what characterizes the Norwegian, democratic society of today.

In the aristocratic society, on the other hand, everyone knows their rightful, social place. In a democratic society, everyone moves around at high speed while at the same time being extremely concerned with giving the impression of closeness through cuddly talk such as "Enjoy yourself!"

 Up until the nineteen seventies, the exalted and respectful form of speech «DU» (Norwegian: De; German: Sie) was used in Norway, but then something happened; the Norwegian State intervened and set out to remove the respectful form «DU» (German: Sie), and instead introduced the disrespectful «you» (German: Du) form.

The "YOU" form was simply too exalted; the Norwegian State did not like it. And then all impressions of aristocracy and upper class were leveled off and replaced with mediocrity and unworthiness.

 Now it was okay to be a bully dressed in a suit. The "you" form (German: Du) enabled a shift from the rhetorically exalted to the rhetorically absurd and has contributed greatly to the general disso-lution of social norms.

RS-24 YARS

Norway has become prime target, and its tiny population of 5.4 million does not stand a chance.

CLICK AND PLAY VIDEO RS-24 YARS

When you feel the unbearable heat from a Russian Iskander M missile frying the skin of your face and a Yars-24 Intercontinental ballistic missile take out sixty percent of Trondheim in Mid Norway, it's a bit late to start thinking of creating dialogue and common ground with Russia, isn’t it? In the meantime, God help us all, the Norwegian political whore will continue to provoke and shock.



A B61-12 being mounted under an F-15E Strike Eagle

The unconstitutional Norwegian whore!

For what does it benefit a Nation if it gains the whole world, but loses  its identity? For what can a Nation give in exchange for its identity? Foreign troops and nuclear veapons are not permittet on Norwegian soil, but they are both here. The law applies equally to the Government as it applies to the common man!

B61-12: The Norwegian population will not be able to absorb a Russian retaliation

 But we had something called dignity in ourselves. And we believed that this dignity could bring us safely through, whatever came in our way.

Click picture below Play B61-12 

There was a time when some of us actually

believed in political dignity!

Dear friends and readers! There was a time in the mid-1950’ies when I grew up in a small place in Oslo called Kampen, from French Campement, encampment. It was a nice place of old, working class houses, a school, and a church. Girls dressed in skirts with flower pattern, boys in nice trousers, not jeans.



Kampen, Oslo Norway around 1955

CLICK PICTURE PLAY VIDEO

We believed in the flag, our country, and the constitution. Every 17^th of May on the National Day, we marched together singing nationalistic songs and afterwards we had hot dog and lemonade. The war was behind us and the future looked bright. In the 1950’ies we believed in the common good for all. Although most of us were from modest economic background. But we had something called dignity in ourselves. And we believed that this dignity could bring us safely through, whatever came in our way.

With the advancement of the petrochemical industry new products such as plastic and polyutherane came to market. Girls no longer dressed in skirt but skin-tight Spandex trousers. Anatomically revealing their vulva. Men followed up! There was a change in the mindset. What was unheard of in the 50’ies and 60’ies now became not only acceptable, but mainstream. Shockingly provocative, and vulgar as it was.

The North Atlantic Treaty Organization, NATO, was created with dignity in mind. To protect life and the values that we in the West adhere to. It was a respectable organization with respectable men and women. With the advancement of propulsion technology, bomb, and electronic technology new products such as thermonuclear B61-12 and F-16 and F-35 fighter jets came to markets. Strategically revealing their through purpose. Countries were encouraged to accept these new technologies. And, again there was a change in the mindset. What was unheard of in the 50’ies and 60’ies now became not only acceptable, but mainstream. Shockingly dangerous and unpredictable as it is.

Norway went from no foreign troops on its soil to accepting US Marines through the back door. As a test operation. It went from no nukes on its soil to full, nuclear engagement, again through the backdoor, without even bother to let the people vote on the issue. A clear moral breach, and a far step away from dignity.



Change in Norway’s policy from a friendly and respectable bilateral relation with Russia to an aggressive and provocative stance in the mid 1980’ies and onwards reveal a character flaw never seen before in this nations history.

A lie flourished in the corridors of power: Strut you ass and reveal your vulva and one will be guaranteed eternal life!  And that is what Norway did. Went to bed with Washington and became a whore. Never for a moment thinking of the real consequences for its marginal population of 5.4 million, but whore-like painted them up into a corner they now cannot escape from.

We admire the United States of America! Beacon of the free World! And as Norwegians we respect Washington. But the reasoning on the Norwegian side is wrong. Norway’s mission  in the world is to create peace and common ground. Also, with its big neighbor Russia. Today!

The ultimate betrayal is to sit and wait for an opportunity, and then when it arrives, use that opportunity to take possession of the truth and twist and bend that truth in order to make it a supportive case for one’s own intentions, such as the right-wing Norwegian Solberg Government does today. This is a profoundly serious legal and humanistic matter, shockingly depleted of human dignity.

 THE VERY FIRST INSTALLATION TO BE TAKEN OUT IN A CONFLICT

Norway: Globus III Vardo

A Petrofilm study: A 45Kt nuclear Air-burst detonation (3xHiroshima) over central Trondheim in Mid-Norway will bring Norway to its knees. Every one of the eight US Marine pre-positioned supply caves will be neutralized within minutes. Oslo will then be given an ultimatum to give up Counties Trondelag, Troms and Finmark, which would give Russia more ice-free harbors.

CLICK AND PLAY VIDEO NUCLEAR AIR BURST

BEHIND THE CURTAIN OF OBEDIENCE TO THE LAW

NORWAY'S SECRET POLICE OPERATES

A LAWLESS AND DEHUMANIZING

STATE WITHIN THE STATE

Painting by Adolf-Wissel: Kallenberger farmer family, 1939

 HARASS AND DESTROYS THE LIVES OF MANY

The war was not over! The war which ended in 1945 has continued to this day. Norwegian secret police targets writers, journalists, and people in opposition to the lawlessness and disregard for human rights within the secret police force, the department of Justice in Oslo and other departments. Petrofilm.com:

Norwegian police and scumbags breaks §90, the spy paragraph, Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and the United Nations Human Rights when they spy on their own population for the American Embassy's SIMAS program.

Infiltrates the Church and harass people during Mass

This lawless secret police infiltrates the Catholic Church and turn the Church against members of their own church. The secret police put out false rumors among people, in shops, at working places to disregard and exclude enemies of the state.(Documented)

Use false cellular towers to obtain data

Taps mobile phones from false cellular towers in moving and stationary vehicles, and uses the information obtained to further make life as destructive as possible. Obtain flight data from airlines to follow and further harass. (Documented)

Harass Norwegian citizens abroad

Follow people abroad. Operates in Spain and other countries in order to crush opposition. Provoke people on the streets in Oslo, walk them down, block entrances in doors to shops and arrive on peoples workplaces to provoke trouble so as to get people fired. (Documented)

Put out sleazy rumors to discredit targets

They use cheap tactics and put out rumors of homosexuality, pedophilia and other deviance's to further discredit people. They visit neighbors of targets and tell them that this person is a bad person. They do all which is humanly possible to destroy the life of any who have an opinion which goes against their own.(Documented)

Create dialogue and you're an Enemy of the State

And they themselves do not present evidence to justify their mafia-like operations. Specially of those who will have dialogue with Russia, instead of war. You look to the East in today’s Norway, and you are as good as an enemy of the State.

The Norwegian secret police have access to a myriad of people with whom they cooperate. They work through people, so that the marks of their deed shall not be evident.

Traitors of truth and human rights. Instigators of trouble and death threats en par with Chiles right-wing Pinochet Junta. (Documented)

Norway's secret  police: "The truth is what We say it is!"

The Norwegian Nazi Police from the War has disappeared, but the substantive core of evil has not. This is Norway of today, on the same level as in the East German Democratic Republic DDR under Walter Ulbricht, the life under Stalin and in Croatia under Ante Pavelic.(Documented)

A Dictatorship of the Partitocracy

Norway has a shine-democracy - a dictatorship of the partitocracy which erodes real prosperity and real human rights for the population and operates as a State within a State.

Petrofilm.com has in it's possession a huge amount of evidence of the operations of the Secret State. This is not

a joke or a fantasy, it is real.

The Norwegian Quislings of today sell out Norway's population and destroys opposition with an iron fist. (Documented)

Security Incident Management Analysis System SIMAS

Data mining from Government servers constitutes a serious crime and should be prosecuted. However, the United States' State Department should be careful not to exploit its Security Incident Management Analysis System, SIMAS in a dehumanizing way. (Documented)

Sell out their own people to a foreign power

It is a fact that Norwegian police and intelligence operatives work hand-in-glove with the United States Embassy in Oslo mining a huge amount of personal data from ordinary Norwegian citizens.

Thus, violating §90, the Spy paragraph, which states that "working for a foreign power is a serious crime and is punishable." (Documented)

The Law applies equally to everyone

Breaking the United Nations Human Rights and the Fundamental Charter of the European Union on personal protection is a serious crime too. Before criticizing code breakers and journalists around the world, the United States should first scrutinize its own endeavors. You can't live crooked and think straight, weather you're a chauffeur or a Chief of State! The Law applies equally to everyone. (Documented)

Until the mid 1960'ies leading Nazi's were still associated within the Norwegian Police.

The Norwegian Nazi Police instigated harassment and deportation of all Norwegian Jews that they could lay their hands on and sent them express to the cremation ovens in the concentration camps in Poland. The Norwegian Police has never been indicted for its participation in administrative and practical work in the genocide of the Norwegian Jews.(Documented)

PEOPLE WHO RECOGNIZED THE DANGER OF FASCISM

When we have to do with human beings there are particularly three words that comes to mind, empathy, respect and dignity. What you will read and watch here are the opposite of those three words, combined in one common slogan, "fascism". The seed of fascism lies within us, in the general public, and it is there waiting to pop out at the right time under a charismatic fascist leader. (Documented)

The colder it gets between people the more fascism thrives

In my own work dealing with people and dialogue in general, I have come to experience that many of us are not capable of viewing another human being right in front of ourselves with warmth, empathy, and humanness. I believe this defect to be one of several primary causes for disharmony, conflict, and war. I call this phenomenon, The coldness between people. (Documented)

Click and Play

Teodor Ludwig Wiesengrund Adorno - German philosopher, 

ONE CANNOT FREE ONESELF IN ONES OWN COURT

 Norway's so called "official apology" which the Norwegian State has proclaimed, does not however, in itself give absolution for their guilt. One cannot free oneself in one’s own Court. A Police Force which has commit such a heinous crime once is able to do repeat it. The German philosopher Carl Jaspers has said, “Has it happened the first time then it can happen again!”

The German philosopher Theodor Adorno also points in this direction saying that, "Without the lack of warmth between people, Holocaust would never had happened."

 Click and Play

Karl Jaspers - Wesen der Existenz (Gespräch 1960)Karl Jaspers, "If it has happened once, it can happen again."

 Click and Play

Hannah Arendt: Das Wagnis der Öffentlicghkeit

  Click and Play

Erich Fromm Anatomie der menschlichen Destructivitet 

Erich Fromm at his writing desk in Locarno, Switzerland



76 YEARS AFTER THE WAR

Seventy six years after the War ended I find it most disturbing to live in a society were those who shall upheld the Law, the Police, is in fact the very same organization that killed the Jews, individuals like you and me. This fact makes each and everyone of us vulnerable, because if has happened once it can happen again. And it does happen again, every day, although in a more subtle form. It is called a free and democratic society, free to harass and kill, democratic when it suites the purpose. A major lesson here is the vulnerability of the individual when faced with the institutions of the State when these institutions are not committed to the defense of the individual.



"That which has happened is a warning!" Karl Jaspers

 "To forget it is guilt. It must be continually remembered. It was possible for this to happen. And it remains possible for it to happen again at any minute. Only in knowledge can it be prevented." 

Karl Theodor Jaspers German, Born 23 February 1883 – 26 February 1969 was a German-Swiss psychiatrist and philosopher who had a strong influence on modern theology  psychiatry, and philosophy. After being trained in and practicing psychiatry, Jaspers turned to philosophical inquiry and attempted to discover an innovative philosophical system. He was often viewed as a major exponent of existentialism in Germany, though he did not accept the label.

This is what the Present Norwegian Fascist Police did to the Norwegian Jews in 1943

Editor-in-chief: "Within the same and single mind two opposite behavior pattern emerge: One for the preservation of life, and the other for eliminating life. To me that is a most disturbing mystery."

Senator Alben W. Barkley, member of a committee investigating Nazi atrocities, looks at a pile of bodies at Buchenwald concentration camp. The bodies had been left out in the sun and rain for almost two weeks after the liberation of Buchenwald on April 11, 1945. There had been so many deaths before the liberation of the camp that the crematorium ovens were not able to keep up.

They did it once, and it can happen again. We have no guarantee that it will not happen again.

Members of the 42nd Rainbow Division, 7th US Army uncovering a wagon transporting some of the horrors of Dachau. Dachau was the first of the Nazi concentration camps in Germany, intended to hold political prisoners.

The Norwegian Police has apologized for their deeds. Apologized? You cannot free yourself in your own court! These people are guilty as Hell.

Inmates of the Ampfing sub-camps in Germany after having been liberated by US Third Army troops in1945. Sub-camps are a lesser known aspect of the concentration camp system in Nazi Germany. Prisoners in the Waldlager V and VI, located near the town of Ampfing, were housed in barracks partially submerged in the ground with soil-covered roofs designed to camouflage the structures from Allied aerial reconnaissance.

American soldiers force German civilians from the town of Volary to walk past a group exhumed bodies of 30 Jewish women starved to death by SS troops in a 300-mile march from Helmbrechts concentration camp across Czechoslovakia and then buried, May 1945. 

"Thou shalt not kill"

ONE CAN NOT FREE ONESELF IN ONES OWN COURT

Within the same and single mind two opposite behavior pattern emerge: One for the preservation of life, and the other for eliminating life. To me that is a most disturb-ing mystery.



The brutal Norwegian police together with their fascist friends in the Nazi-inspired Hirden-organization committed administrative mass-murder and physical crimes against Norwegian Jews and Humanity. However, they were never indicted for their heinous crimes, but instead absolved their own sins in a pathetic apology from Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg, the present Chair of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, NATO. Which is another example of how these people protect each other.

KLICK HERE: THE NORWEGIAN POLICE DOUBLE STANDARDS

Hello friends! No one else in the society could get off such a huge crime as the murder of six million Jews is, without an indictment followed by a conviction. Norwegian right-wing terrorist Ander Behring Breivik, for instance was swiftly tried and he received life in prison. The Norwegian police, however, was an integrated part, although not one of the largest, of the third Reich's grand solution to the Jew problem, but was not charged.

Clearly, as everyone can see, we are talking double standards here, one for the police and another one for the people!

In principle there is no difference between the administrative work that Adolf Eichmann did and the administrative work that the Norwegian police did with regards to the Jews. Both instances facilitated and managed the logistics of mass deportations and murder of the Jews, but only one of them was charges for it!

THE POLICE AND THE CULTURAL POLITICS OF FASCISM 1940-2020

They have created a State within the State. They themselves proclaim that they are above the Law, while continuing to harass and destroy the lives of many people. Behind their facade of obedience to the Law they have sold out their own people to a foreign power.

These are the people who like to be looked up to and walk  around with an incredible hubris of vain power. These are the people who has put the lives of many in great danger by invited foreign troops and thermo-nuclear weapons onto Norwegian soil.

Our leaders are not qualified to bring Mankind safely forward

1938 REVISITED?

One mistake, and the world as we know it is gone. One slightest error, and the civilization that we so proudly and arrogantly cling to will dissolve into fine dust encircling our desolated planet.

But, that fact does not seem to bother anyone. Wrapped in hyper-logic exasperations of the most desolated sort, mankind is rapidly drifting towards its own disintegration; proclaimed by rational world leaders as “a sustainable future” with “zero emission”. It is all a lie!

There is no “sustainable future” and “zero emission” is a fantasy product presented, while death and destruction are filling our lungs.

 And I am not referring to the ongoing pandemic. Not at all. That, after all, is a minor incident in the Grand drama. In 1993 I went with the Norwegian-owned buoy-tanker Anna Knutsen from Antwerp in the Netherlands to the Statfjord C buoy on the Norwegian side. We collected 200.000tons of crude and brought it back to Tees-side in England. There are twenty and more tankers shuttling up to Norway every month collecting crude. Each of these giants evaporate enough carbon-gas to destroy life in a small town. Multiply that with 2000, because that is the daily gift of poisonous vapor which Norway, in all it’s green, self-proclaimed hype, gives back to mankind. Just a thought.

Here is another one. In 2003 I visited Fushun in North-East China. What’s so interesting about Fushun, you might ask? Fushun is the place of the Ping Ding Massacre. The one that Japan committed towards the local, Chinese population there. But, again, that is a minor incident in the Grand drama. For centuries Fushun’s West Pit has been the largest open-pit coal mine in Asia. It contributed greatly to China’s new prosperity, before it was shut down in 2019.

 We will accept any solution – and I underline “any” – to advance the economy. We will even burn down the Rain Forrest in Brazil. The common lounge of renewable oxygen in the world. While lame European Union and the United States watch by and do nothing.

 We are on the edge of an unfathomable deep abyss. From where there is no hope of survival. Just as it was in 1938 in the German Reich. They believed in the cause and failed. We believe in our cause, and we are failing. Again. These days as we are living are the days of 1938 revisited.

Our leaders are not qualified to bring mankind safely forward. Covid-19 has proved that. We are going down on a first-class ticket with no possibility of return.

Amused? Have a wonderful day!

 THE STATE AS CHURCH?

This is the Dictatorship of the Partitocracy

NORWAY THE PARLIAMENT

The most devastating decision for Norway in recent times was to harass and ultimately destroy the Catholic Church in the country. Introduce Protestantism and, through an iron-sifted church and Ministry of Education, impose bureaucratic directives on the people. The State took on the role of both tax collector and spiritual guide. The following of this new arrangement has in reality made most of Norway's population atheists and the country a cultural bracket; yes, it is an almost cultural underdeveloped and sexualy norm-breaking society without much other values ​​than cold money.

The Norwegian State - young as it is in European history, has a rude and free-spirited attitude when, on its own behalf, it imposes on the population its extremely troublesome opinions about what it believes is right and proper in ecclesiastical and in family planning matters. Here is a recent example of State abuse versus citizen in a Child Welfare case:

Strasbourg, December 22, 2020

Norway Convicted in another Child Welfare case

In the Human Rights Court, Strasbourg

Norway today violated the right to family life in a child welfare case where foster parents were allowed to adopt, the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) states.

The case is about a girl who the child welfare service took over the care for just days after she was born. The girl was placed in a foster home, and the mother was granted four visits a year, each of two hours. When the girl was four years old, the mother was deprived of parental rights, and the county council approved that the girl could be adopted. The mother went to court to change the decision, but did not succeed. It is the mother who has appealed the case to the Human Rights Court in Strasbourg.



This is the dictatorship of the partitocracy wrapped in gold-embroidered gloves and foggy talk. In front of an increasingly indifferent population that has been detached from the Mother Church almost by a kind of «military coup.” I am referring here to the commander of Akershus Fortress in Oslo, who in his time had the Catholic Sistersiencer Abbey on Hovedøya (the Main Island), which is located deep in the Oslo fjord, demolished and burned to the ground. Much of the remaining stones of the Abbey was taken and used as building material for the fortress itself.

The State clearly saw the Catholic Church as a real threat. As an example, §2 in Norway's laws between 1814 and 1956 prohibited Catholic Jesuits admissions to the Kingdom. In 1636 by the order of the Danish King Christian the Fourth who residence in Copenhagen, Norway was forcefully detached from the Catholic Church and joined to the Lutheran Protestant Church. That became the end of the Catholic Era for Norway. This was a catastrophic mistake for Norway's further development as a Nation and it's people, and has in later years contributed to cultural isolationism and non-integration in the European Community, among other things. (Read my article: Norway as a non-piety State) 



  Norway as a non-piety State

By the Editor-in-Chief

"The decline of Spirituality in the West in general, the weakening and the right-out abolishment of the Christian faith in many places today, and the materialization and dehumanization process reflected in the general coldness between people, gives reason for great concern."

Norway's King Haakon IV, "What happened to spirituality in Norway?"

In the Norwegian society of today, Man is undoubtedly being reduced to the weight of his own body. The newspapers write about losing and gaining weight every, single day. "It's all about meat, meat and more meat," says Harald Dahle, "and nothing about Man as a Spiritual being in God. In their educations Norwegians learn nothing about Spirituality, but every-thing about fiscal policies and fancy theories." He reflects on the Norwegian's Laissez-faire type mantra "to Enjoy.“ With the full blessing and encouragement of an authoritative and non-spiritual State, off course! You know, the Norwegians does not really have anything of spiritual value, and this is why they so desperately try the become what they are not and can never be, canonized.

The decline of Spirituality in the West in general, the weakening and the right out abolishment of the Christian faith in many places today, and the materialization and dehumanization process reflected in the general coldness between people, gives reason for great concern; in Norway, however, this is "business as usual", a stroke of death before the curtain fall. Before we as less civilized and empathic people criticize religion and spirituality in the Islamic Republic of Iran today one should first explain and understand the collapse of Christianity as a main factor in the western societies of today. In the Age of conspicuous consumption, oil and gas, sexual "freedom" and decline of conservative values the Norwegian society is identified with an overwhelming absence of piety in combination with a cold, disdained and superfluous inter-human relations almost devoid of human dignity. Just as it was in the last days before the fall of the decadent, Roman Empire!

On the streets of Oslo, the Norwegians bow their small and worried heads down towards their large, active-matrix organic light-emitting diode screens on their cell phones. And that they do all day! And it is the only time ever when the Norwegians bow their heads! On the walls of the houses in capital Oslo, there are not the minutest sign of spirituality. No, al-fresco paintings of the apostles, the Blessed Virgin Mary, a cross, some ornaments pointing towards a cultural connection with continental Europe. Nothing! The capital is chemically, organically, and spiritually devoid of any sign of a higher and dignified purpose in life. Alongside country roads leading through walleyes and over plains, through small towns and barren fields there is not a single cross, no memory built for an ancient, Christian pilgrim who shall have walked and died there. Not a signpost pointing towards a time when Norway was a country belonging together in spirit with the other Christian nations on the grand mainland of Europe.

THE SLIPPERY SLIDE TO HUMAN CATASTROPHE “In my work dealing with people and dialogue, “says Harald Dahle, “I have come to learn that many of us are not capable if viewing another human being right in front of ourselves with warmth, empathy and humanness. I believe this defect to be one of several primary causes for disharmony, conflict and war!" This phenomena bears special relevance to the people of Norway who actually live on an "island" - with the North Sea on one side and the forest and mountains bordering to Sweden and Russia on the other - and can do as they damn well please without having to take into account the more aristocratic and refined continental European culture further south. "I was in Munich already in 1956 and was raised in Sissach in Canton Basel Land in Switzerland," says Dahle whose father became a Swiss citizen. Harald Dahle, it sets the Norwegian cold and minimalistic Lutheran Church, controlled by the Department of Church -and Culture, in a certain perspective!

"The German philosopher, sociologist and composer Teodor Ludwig Wiesengrund Adorno, left picture, has also had opinions about the "coldness between people phenomena: “Without the chilly and disdained behavior between people, the extermination of the Jews would not have taken place in Germany” he warned. Adorno was a leading member of the Frankfurt School of critical theory, whose work has come to be associated with thinkers such as Ernst Bloch, Walter Benjamin, Max Horkheimer and Herbert Marcuse , for whom the works of Freud, Marx and Hegel were essential to a critique of modern society. He is widely regarded as one of the 20th century's foremost thinkers on aesthetics and philosophy, as well as one of its pre-eminent essayists. As a critic of both fascism and what he called the cultural industry, his writings - such as Dialectic of Enlightenment (1947), Minima Moralia (1951) and Negative Dialectic (1966) - strongly influenced the European New Left.



Picture of the day

Russians meet Norwegians sheltering in a mine in Finmark

 The underdogs crawl out of the cave! 

Dear friends and readers, introducing,

Yes, we love this Country as it Rises Forth!

How Russia phobia in Norway today undermines Democracy and tramples on Human Rights, and the slogan “not to be prepared” is Norway’s blatant excuse to draw massive US military and financial support.

'

 The first line in the Norwegian National Anthem goes like, “Yes, we love this Country as it rises forth…” It is a beautiful, poetic line; it sets a dreamlike direction for the country in combination with an uncertain vision of the future. The country rises, but it is not certain how much it rises and what direction it will take.

 Far, far away Norway shimmered like Gold 

She is forty-three years old and is the store manager for a computer shop in Oslo. One day, four men and a woman enter the shop; they line up in front of the desk where she works helping customers. The woman in the five-person group approaches her and says, “I have a problem with this hard drive,” she holds up a small, portable drive, “can you fix it for me?” she asks the woman behind the counter. She responds, “We don’t do this kind of operation here,” but I can certainly try and fix it for you privately and you can collect it here tomorrow, if that is acceptable to you?” The middle-aged woman agrees to pay forty dollars for the service.”

 The next day the woman arrives back in the shop. The store manager says, “Here it is, I fixed the drive for you.” The woman responds, “I don’t want it!” The store manager says, “But, why…we had an agreement!” Whereupon the woman says, “I don’t want it because you did it privately!”

 Two days later, the female store manager was told to come to a meeting with the owner of the computer shop, a lawyer, and a friend of hers. She came. Her friend, the lawyer, introduced an unknown person. He said, “He is a person who works here; I have got  complaints about you.” The lawyer points to four letters laying in front of him on the table. “These letters are from the Police Academy in Oslo (Politiskolen). The perplexed store manager responded, “Can I see them please?” She stretches out her arm to receive a letter. The lawyer answered, “Sorry, no you cannot take a look.”

 The store manager was kicked out of her position as store manager. No job, no money, no food. During the following thirty years, the same woman was harassed on the streets, literally walked down, phone was tapped, work was denied, assignments destroyed, a car given to her by an auto dealer as part of a project was suddenly taken away from her after someone had called the dealer and badmouthed her. Priest and nuns in the Catholic church were she used to go were introduced with falsified stories about her. One priest attacked her inside the church. She was harassed on weekly basis inside shops, at cafés, in restaurants and in public libraries and public places.

 Why does this happen in Norway today? Because this honest woman had been a journalist for the largest  newspaper in Norway “Aftenposten” and the right-wing newspaper “Morgenbladet” and had been an independent freelancer for many years and written about potential Russian infiltration in the European peace movements protesting against the deliverance of the US-made Neutron bomb to Europe. She had also written about Russian operations in Norway and through her work rubbed arms with Russians in Oslo. The violation of United Nations Article 23, the Right to work, and massive violations of basic human rights were of no concern to the Norwegian Authorities and the secret Police.

 The woman now learned that another kind of country, another Norway, “ was rising forth”. One of suppression and a marginal life. She is still alive, but for how long, it is uncertain.

A Police force that dragged Norwegian Jews out of bed at 4AM, squeezed them into waiting taxies, and shipped them to Nazi extermination camps in Poland has no problem with taking the life of one, single individual!  They have no problems with establishing a complete stand-down to let one single man, Anders Behring Breivik take all the lives he possible wished for, without one single shot being fired to stop him, neither in Oslo nor on the Out Island (Utøya) Labor Party holiday camp for teenagers. Among several thousand police at work that day, not one was authorized to interfere. “Yes, we love this Country as it rises forth…”

The Norwegian is a good person. A kind person. And a person one can trust. This is why people who come to Norway enjoy being here. But somewhere in the collective psyche, and I am not sure at what time it happened, the Norwegian had to make an existential choice; take upon himself the role of the meek underdog who need the reassuring support of a stronger dog, or to adhere to real patriotism who is strong enough to stand on ones own two feet. Reliable enough to be trusted by others and honest enough  not to exploit the generosity of the United States of America.

 We all want to sell something. Weather it is 54 F-35 fighter jets, services, oil, and gas, or in some cases us. It has been indicated by some that Norway has become the 51^st state of the United States, and with good reason. When the Norwegian sing, “Yes, we love this Country as it rises forth,” it is pertinent to ask, which country is he then referring to? The country, which is the Beacon of the Free World, the United States of America, or a tiny, barren strip of land at the outermost edge of Europe which is trying hard to be what it is not, honest to itself and to its people?

DEFENSE NORWAY

  NORWAY LOST THE WAR BEFORE IT HAD STARTED

 INHUMANE CONDITIONS

AS A RESULT OF FLAWED POLITICS

Illustration from Peter Watkins Movie The War Game

From a human-protection point of view, the Norwegian people are being led astray and are having the truth omitted to them by incompetent, biased politicians and bureaucrats. The Department of Defense and the Directorate for Civil Preparedness will not tell the truth of how dire the situation for the Norwegian people is thereby being guilty of exposing its population to inhumane sufferings, mass casualties and mass deaths! Due to a catastrophically lack of preparedness, Norway will lose the next war before it starts.

中文版  

 我們必須與中華人民共和國建立對話和共同點。

中國絕不能孤立。那會導致戰 爭

中國

他們在國家內部建立了一個國家。他們自己宣稱自己凌駕於法律之上，同時繼續騷擾和破壞許多人的生命。在他們遵守法律的門面的背後，他們將自己的人民賣給了外國勢力。這些人喜歡被抬頭仰望，帶著令人難以置信的虛榮心雜亂無章地走來走去。這些人通過邀請外國軍隊和熱核武器將許多人的生命置於極大的危險之中，這些人被帶到了挪威的土地上。歷史將評判這些叛徒。

   親愛的讀者們。

總編輯的真誠意見是，最好是在同情，尊重和尊嚴的基礎上與俄羅斯和中國建立對話與共同點，而不是加劇緊張局勢並冒著核對峙的危險。由於這個簡單的原因，除了英語以外，petrofilm.com還被部分翻譯成俄文和中文。在這種情況下，俄羅斯意味著俄羅斯人居住在歐洲大平原上烏拉爾山脈以西的歐洲一側。謝謝您的理解，祝您有美好的一天。



騷擾和破壞許多人的生活

 挪威的秘密警察在本州內作為一個州運作

戰爭還沒有結束。 1945年結束的戰爭一直持續到今天。挪威秘密警察的目標對像是秘密警察，奧斯陸司法部和其他部門的作家，記者和反對違法行為並無視人權的人。挪威警察和卑鄙的人在為美國大使館的SIMAS計劃監視自己的居民時違反了第90條的規定。

 完全無視人權

違反了§90，間諜段落，挪威法律，《歐盟基本權利憲章》和《聯合國人權》

這位無法無天的秘密警察滲透了天主教堂，使教會對自己教會的成員發動攻擊。秘密警察在商店，工作場所的人中散佈虛假謠言，以無視和排斥國家敵人。竊聽手機並使用獲得的信息進一步使生活變得更具破壞性。從航空公司獲取飛行數據以進行跟踪和進一步騷擾。關注國外人士。在西班牙和其他國家開展活動，以鎮壓反對派。在奧斯陸的街道上激怒人們，向他們走去，在商店的門口封鎖入口，到達人們的工作場所以招惹麻煩，從而將人們開除。他們使用廉價策略，散佈同性戀和其他偏見的謠言，以進一步抹黑人們。他們拜訪目標的鄰居，並告訴他們這個人是壞人。他們盡一切可能破壞任何有反對自己意見的人的生活。特別是那些將與俄羅斯對話而不是戰爭的人。您將目光投向當今挪威的東方，您的生活就好壞了。秘密警察可以與無數與他們合作的人接觸。他們通過人民工作，因此其行為的印記不明顯。真理，人權和正義的叛徒。

挪威的秘密警察：“事實就是我們所說的”

戰爭結束後的挪威納粹警察已經消失，但邪惡的實質核心卻沒有消失。這就是今天的挪威，與沃爾特·烏爾布里希特（Walter Ulbricht）領導下的東德民主共和國復員，斯大林（Satlin）統治下的生活以及克羅地亞（Ante Pavelic）統治下的克羅地亞處於同一水平。挪威有一個光輝的民主國家-獨裁政權的獨裁統治，侵蝕著人民的真正繁榮和真正人權，並在一個國家內部作為一個國家運作。 Petrofilm.com擁有大量有關“秘密國家”運作的證據。這不是玩笑或幻想，它是真實的。今天的挪威魁斯林（Quslings）賣光了挪威的人口，摧毀了反對派。

 當我們與人類有關時，會特別想到三個詞：同理心，尊重和尊嚴。您將在此處閱讀和觀看的是這三個詞的反義詞，並結合了一個常見的口號“法西斯主義”。法西斯主義的種子存在於我們內部，在一般公眾中，它在一個有魅力的法西斯領袖領導下，在適當的時候出現在這裡。

在我自己與人打交道和進行一般對話的工作中，我發現我們中的許多人無法以溫暖，同情和人性的眼光看待另一個人。我認為這種缺陷是造成不和諧，衝突和戰爭的幾個主要原因之一。我稱這種現象為人與人之間的冷漠。



另請參閱中文文件夾中的中文文本 



 主編 相信與中國建立良好的雙邊關係和持久和平符合人類的利益。各國和人民必須放眼長遠，共同努力。

 Translation: The Editor-in-chief believes that establishing good bilateral relations and lasting peace with China is in the interests of Mankind. Countries and people must take a long-term view and work together.

 與中華人民共和國建立對話與共同點

    親愛的讀者們。

總編輯的真誠意見是，最好是在同情，尊重和尊嚴的基礎上與俄羅斯和中國建立對話與共同點，而不是加劇緊張局勢並冒著核對峙的危險。由於這個簡單的原因，除了英語以外，petrofilm.com還被部分翻譯成俄文和中文。在這種情況下，俄羅斯意味著俄羅斯人居住在歐洲大平原上烏拉爾山脈以西的歐洲一側。謝謝您的理解，祝您有美好的一天。

潛艇與英國的

  F-35核威懾力量 

先鋒級是為皇家海軍服務的英國核動力彈道潛艇。每艘潛艇最多配備16枚UGM-133 Trident II導彈。該類是1994年引入的三叉戟核計劃的一部分。該班級包括四艘潛艇：先鋒，維克托里烏斯，警惕和復仇。它們是由Vickers Shipbuilding and Engineering在1986年至1999年在Barrow-Furness建造的，現在由BAE Systems擁有。這些潛艇位於蘇格蘭格拉斯哥以西的HM海軍基地克萊德。



英國的核威懾態勢英國逐漸鞏固了其核力量，因此僅保留了海上戰略威懾成分。英國的獨立核威懾力量通常被稱為“三叉戟”，它由三個主要要素組成：“先鋒”級潛艇是運載“三叉戟”彈道導彈的平台。四艘“先鋒”級潛艇（SSBN）保持連續的海上威懾（CASD），這意味著一艘船始終配備三叉戟導彈進行巡邏。該級從1992年開始服役，並將繼續服役至2030年代。如果英國要維持CASD，一旦潛艇達到使用壽命，則需要使用新型的SSBN來取代Vanguard。這種導彈的射程超過4000海裡，是英國核彈頭的運載工具。根據1998年戰略防禦評論（SDR）和2010年戰略防禦與安全評論（SDSR）的限制，現在每艘Vanguard潛艇只能部署8枚作戰導彈和不超過40枚核彈頭。英國的核彈頭庫存。

建立和維護英國核儲存的基礎設施位於伯克郡的兩個原子武器設施（AWE）站點

2引言有報導稱，影子國防部長埃米莉·桑伯里（Emily Thornberry）審查了勞方國防計劃，考慮以機載系統取代英國目前的潛艇核威懾方案。1該計劃將看到取消先鋒繼任者潛艇計劃，從而終止英國的潛艇計劃。當前的持續海上威懾（CASD）姿態。作為替代方案，將開發一種基於自由落體核彈的能力，這是英國在1950年代和1960年代最後一次使用的一種威懾手段，這項政策建議最初是在2015年大選之前為智庫CentreForum起草的。分析師兼前皇家空軍情報部門儲備人員托比·芬威克（Toby Fenwick）。23芬威克先生是自由民主黨的成員，是該黨的“三叉戟政策工作組”成員。4根據該計劃，英國的洛克希德·馬丁公司F-35輕型II多用途戰鬥機的未來機隊正在採購國防部將進行“雙重使用”，以交付B61-12制導核炸彈。有人提出這架飛機不能提供全天候的能力，但是一旦發生危機，它可能會迅速動員。有關英國的CASDposture可以被機載核力量取代的建議對裁軍，能力，歐洲有嚴重影響。威懾力和成本增加，需要仔細檢查

3對基於F-35的核威懾提案裁軍的批評摘要

批評者認為，利用“雙重用途”飛機進行任何形式的核共享都違反了《核不擴散條約》（NPT）的第一條。根據托比·芬威克（Toby Fenwick）的提議，意大利是《不擴散核武器條約》規定的無核國家，仍將是北約核共享安排的一部分。 可以看到，B61-12型熱核精密自由落體重力炸彈安裝在F-15E攻擊鷹的塔架 

建議將B61-12炸彈的準確性，低產量和對地面穿透能力相結合，使其成為北約核武庫中最有用的核彈。如果英國要開發托比·芬威克（Toby Fenwick）設想的新功能，那將意味著開始一項測試計劃。這不僅會很昂貴，而且很可能違反《核禁試條約》。有人爭辯說，只有將北約飛機交付的戰術核武器完全從歐洲撤走，並僅憑歐洲對戰略核力量的威懾力量，才能為華盛頓和莫斯科創造必要的政治環境，以減少俄羅斯自己的戰術核武器。

能力

基於F-35的核力量將無法達到對敵對國家造成不可接受的損害所必需的全部目標，因此不會取得可信的威懾力。空軍基地和航空母艦容易受到核打擊和常規的先發製人打擊以及恐怖主義。與當前的“三叉戟” II彈道導彈相比，飛機在空中時更容易受到地空導彈的攻擊。在危機期間，基於飛機的系統將需要進行可見部署，這在任何外交危機中都有可能破壞穩定和升級的影響，因為其他國家將能夠在英國動員其核力量時發現。

根據俄羅斯的核武庫現代化計劃，僅基於B61-12自由落體炸彈的英國獨立核威懾力量對有效防禦威懾未來威脅的能力將極為有限。將飛機交付的戰術核武器整合到英國和意大利這兩個國家，將進一步使北約的核威懾態勢合法化，這種態勢不適合冷戰後21世紀的安全環境。以英國為基礎的美國和英國的戰略彈道導彈系統是第二個決策中心，有助於確保東歐盟國保有北約的防禦能力。降低北約核威懾的信譽可能會受到東歐反對派的反對，並可能給歐洲安全環境帶來更大的不確定性。

托比·芬威克（Toby Fenwick）的論文低估了在英國維持本土造船能力的價值。芬威克對於基於F-35的核力量的能力的錯誤估計直接導致他大大低估了有效的基於F-35的核威懾力量的成本。對於英國是否能夠操作維持可信的核威懾所需的所需飛機數量，存在著嚴重的疑問，如果確實這種類型的平台完全適合這種角色的話。由美國領導的F-35計劃充滿了技術和財務問題，涉及許多其他夥伴國家。依靠這個平台提供英國的核威懾力量將是巨大的風險，特別是與英國主權潛艇產業的穩定相比。基於三叉戟的系統的退役可能會花費數十億美元



 文本也用單獨的文件夾翻譯成中文



恥辱！

像美國這樣技術最先進的國家怎麼可能是數字最差，死亡最多的國家呢？之所以發生這種情況，是因為該國的領導層已經腐爛到核心，更多地關注貪婪而不是生命。下圖來自紐約

我們不需要的是電視屏幕上的另一張面孔，bla或其他解釋。站在美國文化中謀殺其公民。將貪婪擺在生前。不安？是的，你應該是！假使人類誤入歧途的假領導者，只不過表現出正派，欺詐和犯罪的光彩。是的，人不單靠麵包生活。但是，如果我們的領導人不以理智和道德的態度對自己的內心和思想都有所了解，那麼我們的救贖將從何而來呢？

你們中有人聽說過建立對話和共同立場嗎？

我們必須與中國建立和平與穩定，而不是仇恨和建立隔離牆。 中國是人類重要和尊重的一部分，如果人類要生存，就必須包括中國。 對於你們所有人-包括WION-TV-您是否想與中國開戰？ 顯然，因為您可惡的言論一次又一次證明了您積極進取，而您的主要興趣是批評。



“向量”威脅

俄羅斯火箭專家在分析美國彈道導彈能力和具有遠距離彈道能力的防空導彈時發現，問題在於美國火箭無法攔截中層中的任何彈道導彈，即高度在35000m至80000m之間。因此，俄羅斯一直致力於開發高超音速巡航飛行手段，這些距離正是在這些不同的高度。美國彈道導彈防禦系統使用的原理是將火箭送入太空，並在撞擊點附近計算彈道導彈的彈道。

美國的攔截彈正在以固體燃料作為亞軌道火箭運行。一旦啟動，便無法停止並且無法調節牽引力。更重要的是，攔截彈將不符合彈道導彈的目標彈道計算，迴避機動以及有關導彈攔截彈的計算。北約的國防存在巨大漏洞！如今，北約正處於關鍵的切入點，如果該聯盟不成為沒有爪子的紙老虎，那麼所有國家都必須應對媒介威脅！伙計們，要保持專注和警覺！消除恐怖主義的一切禍害，對所有人來說都是美好的一天。



捍衛我們的自由

總統拜登（Joe Biden）必須立即重啟與俄羅斯的核對話，以確保歐洲的持續和平，就像裡根（Regan）總統和戈貝切夫（Gorbechev）秘書長在他之前所做的那樣。

今天，包括這位作家在內的許多人都認為，美國應該而不是一直批評某些國家並以長期制裁對其進行懲罰，而是應該首先考慮自己的國內問題！ 1961年，德國猶太人社會心理學家埃里希·弗洛姆（Erich Fromm）在墨西哥和美國居住並當過心理學家，哲學家和作家，後來在瑞士洛迦諾生活和工作，發表了他的論文“人類可以預防嗎？

他在對外交政策的事實和虛構進行的分析中對冷戰進行了分析。弗洛姆指出，“美國，美國和蘇聯都使用相同的預測，將對方視為敵人，並主張結束這種危險的對抗。左圖顯示的是1971年，埃里希·弗羅姆（Erich Fromm）在他位於瑞士洛迦諾的公寓里手稿。波紋管圖片顯示了1961年11月4日至9日在東德西柏林的弗里德里希大街的美國和俄羅斯坦克對桶的情況。潛在的極端危險情況。

這在許多方面都類似於今天的海灣地區局勢，以及北約與俄羅斯在烏克蘭之間不斷升級的對抗。

挪威的逻辑障碍

美国对北越政权的近乎狂热的批评夺去了282,000名美国人的生命，合计1,353,000。 从您自己之外的其他角度对待其他国家可能会带来可怕的后果。 2000年，挪威怀着雄心壮志进入伊朗，三年后被驱逐出境。 2010年，挪威向刘晓波颁发了诺贝尔和平奖，此后不久，他就被赶出了中国。在这两种情况下，挪威都使用支票簿外交手段向后爬行。白俄罗斯目前有一位统治者，他知道他想要什么。挪威总理索尔伯格访问了立陶宛维尔纽斯，并会见了反对卢卡申科总统的领导人斯韦特兰娜·蒂哈诺夫斯卡娅。挪威也不喜欢普京总统。地球上陆地面积最大的国家的领导人。但这似乎并不重要。挪威支持香港所谓的民主反对派团体，这些团体将这座城市变成了战区，为自己的“权利”而战。压制香港是祖国的事实。

觸摸圖片播放視頻

Macron一需要一支歐盟聯合軍事力量來使歐洲擺脫美國的威脅，尤其是在特朗普宣布退出冷戰時代的核條約之後。 “我們必須保護自己，不論是中國，俄羅斯甚至是美國，”他告訴歐洲一家廣播公司，他首次暗示歐洲可能需要從美國進行自衛。法國總統已經制定了主要的國防開支，以使法國與北約的支出目標保持一致，正在帶頭建立一支獨立於北約的九國歐洲快速反應部隊。

    

挪威諾貝爾委員會濫用職權

，並在政治背景下使用該獎項來推動挪威議會Stortinget的議程。他們於2003年與伊朗和七年後與中華人民共和國合作。這兩個例子都證明挪威議會，挪威諾貝爾委員會和奧斯陸外交部在建立可持續對話和國際關係共識方面的能力嚴重缺乏經驗。在這種情況下，挪威為聯合國的共同利益為聯合國安理會作出貢獻的事情對我們來說仍然是一個謎。

中國的法律權利

親愛的朋友和讀者們。 治安是中國的基石。 祖國擁有在其自己的領土後院香港實施法律和秩序的合法權利。 無需徵得任何其他國家的許可。 在西方，這既不是很好理解也不是很受歡迎。 西方天真的從“民主”和“權利”的角度講是政治上的壓迫，是宣傳。 香港是祖國； 只有一個。 美國在製裁世界“每個其他”國家之前，應照顧好自己的人權和黑人公民問題。 祝你有美好的一天，乾杯



PC2000地震調查

當被判有罪的欺詐者Norex Group的Kjell G Finstad乘坐BGP的Xu Wenrong登上豪華護衛艦Grace並逃走了數百萬。閱讀文章。

尊敬的讀者和朋友們！

我們已經意識到當今支持美國政治的暴力文化，儘管通常不承認或報導這類事件，但經常壓制和否認這種事件。 1861年至1865年美國第一次內戰的結果決定了誰應該加入獲勝者俱樂部，並引領這個新國家邁向未來。第二次美國內戰是在我們自己的時代通過隱身進行的，它決定誰不應該包括在獲勝者俱樂部中。

正是在這兩種矛盾的情況下，美國發生的許多暴力政治死亡事件使我們更加清楚地表達了自己的看法，以我們以前從未意識到的方式脫穎而出，並向我們發出了警告。保持警惕。幫助打擊國內外恐怖主義。向當局報告可疑事件。祝你有美好的一天，加油！

北約核

核空軍基地，歐洲，美國核倉庫，美國海軍早 期預警，即時響應相控陣雷達

歐洲和美國以及北約之間的深刻分裂不能成為歐洲土地上戰術核武器的守護者。必須由歐洲控制，而不是由美國控制。Macron一需要一支歐盟聯合軍事力量來使歐洲擺脫美國的威脅，尤其是在特朗普宣布退出冷戰時代的核條約之後。 “我們必須保護自己，不論是中國，俄羅斯甚至是美國，”他告訴歐洲一家廣播公司，他首次暗示歐洲可能需要從美國進行自衛。法國總統已經制定了主要的國防開支，以使法國與北約的支出目標保持一致，正在帶頭建立一支獨立於北約的九國歐洲快速反應部隊。



中國的法律權利

親愛的朋友和讀者們。 治安是中國的基石。 祖國擁有在其自己的領土後院香港實施法律和秩序的合法權利。 無需徵得任何其他國家的許可。 在西方，這既不是很好理解也不是很受歡迎。 西方天真的從“民主”和“權利”的角度講是政治上的壓迫，是宣傳。 香港是祖國； 只有一個。 美國在製裁世界“每個其他”國家之前，應照顧好自己的人權和黑人公民問題。 祝你有美好的一天，乾杯

總統唐納爾·J·特朗普造成了非常危險的內部和跨大西洋崩潰！

迪士尼樂園是這個國家最高的智力貢獻。

這方面只有批評。跨大西洋的關係是極限！特朗普皇帝與歐洲政治領導人和北約夥伴進行對話-長官貴賓犬除了詹斯·斯托爾滕貝格，聽話的北約秘書長唐納德·J·特朗普。老實說，我們不感激！
我們也不重視美國拒絕《 INF條約》並使歐洲脆弱的事實。皇帝的最後誓言是一時興起裁減美軍在德國！一遍又一遍地證明唐納德·J·特朗普總統是我們不信任的人。但是，他應該向真正的總統約翰·肯尼迪（John F. Kennedy）學習，他給了歐洲人，尤其是德國人民在困難時期的希望和方向。但是他沒有！

挪威諾貝爾委員會濫用職權

，並在政治背景下使用該獎項來推動挪威議會Stortinget的議程。他們於2003年與伊朗和七年後與中華人民共和國合作。這兩個例子都證明挪威議會，挪威諾貝爾委員會和奧斯陸外交部在建立可持續對話和國際關係共識方面的能力嚴重缺乏經驗。在這種情況下，挪威為聯合國的共同利益為聯合國安理會作出貢獻的事情對我們來說仍然是一個謎。

。在世界外交舞台上取得的驚人成就。

伊朗與挪威之間的局勢是一場災難，隨著挪威國家石油公司（Statoil）受賄案的迅速展開，僅用了十二個月，挪威就被徹底踢出了伊朗。 2010年之後不久，挪威又引爆了另一枚外交炸彈，這次是與中國一起爆炸的，這是天真地向中國反對派人物溫家寶頒發了諾貝爾和平獎。挪威花了十年的時間在中華人民共和國建立了新的外交據點。波斯和中國是人類最古老的兩種文化，在不到十年的時間裡都拒絕了挪威的使用。在世界外交舞台上取得的驚人成就。



你們中有人聽說過建立對話和共同立場嗎？

我們必須與中國建立和平與穩定，而不是仇恨和建立隔離牆。 中國是人類重要和尊重的一部分，如果人類要生存，就必須包括中國。 對於你們所有人-包括WION-TV-您是否想與中國開戰？ 顯然，因為您可惡的言論一次又一次證明了您積極進取，而您的主要興趣是批評。

Translation: Have any one of you heard of creating dialogue and common ground? We must create peace and stability with China, not hate and build walls. China is an important and respectful part of Humanity, and if Humanity want to survive, China must be included. To all of you - including WION-TV - do you want war with China? Clearly, because your hateful rhetoric proves again and again that you are aggressive and that your main interest is to criticize.



 點擊圖片播放視頻

CLICK PICTURE PLAY VIDEO

習近平，我們的中國夢

 還重申

 TikTok還重申，它從未與中國當局共享數據，也從未按照當局的命令審查內容。該公司進一步表示，將近整整一年它一直試圖與美國進行真誠的談判。Bytedance寫道：“相反，我們遇到的是一個沒有考慮事實的政府，沒有通過標準的法律程序就規定了協議的條款，而是試圖干預私人公司之間的談判，” Bytedance寫道。 

COVID-19並非中國病毒，必須停止陰謀論

      與中國建立對話與共同點。 我們不建議進行熱核戰爭。 

與中國和平相處

中華人民共和國對美國和歐盟的持續騷擾作出了反應。 世界人民應該放眼長遠，與中國建立對話和共同立場，而不是短視，以便人民解決共同問題，鼓勵良好合作。 COVID-19是共同的全球挑戰，需要最佳的合作。 中國的污名化和政治化是幼稚的，不是很聰明，並且有潛在的危險。 我們只有一個星球，讓我們共同努力。 中國是和平與穩定的重要貢獻者。



 隱秘的平民戰爭 美國。

在唐納德·J·特朗普總統的領導下，

美國社會的兩極分化變得更加明顯。

我們已經意識到當今支持美國政治的暴力文化，儘管通常不承認或報導這類事件，但經常壓制和否認這種事件。 1861年至1865年美國第一次內戰的結果決定了誰應該加入獲勝者俱樂部，並將這個新國家引領到未來。

第二次美國內戰是在我們自己的時代通過隱身進行的，它正在決定誰不應該包括在獲勝者俱樂部中。正是在這兩個矛盾的情況下，美國發生的許多暴力政治死亡事件使我們更加清楚地表達了自己的看法，以我們從未意識到的方式脫穎而出，並向我們發出了警告。保持警惕。幫助打擊國內外恐怖主義。向當局報告可疑事件。祝

   我們必須與中華人民共和國建立對話和共同點。

  中國絕不能孤立。那會導致戰 爭

香港

中國的法律權利

親愛的朋友和讀者們。 治安是中國的基石。 祖國擁有在其自己的領土後院香港實施法律和秩序的合法權利。 無需徵得任何其他國家的許可。 在西方，這既不是很好理解也不是很受歡迎。 西方天真的從“民主”和“權利”的角度講是政治上的壓迫，是宣傳。 香港是祖國； 只有一個。 美國在製裁世界“每個其他”國家之前，應照顧好自己的人權和黑人公民問題。 祝你有美好的一天，乾杯

歐美關係

中國不能克制，過去三十年來美國一直在睡覺。歐美之間的關係發生了衝突，夥伴關係也因此破裂。 Covid-19暴露出西方領導人的災難性缺乏和準備。華盛頓可以在20年前與德黑蘭握手，但要讓這個“千載難逢的機會”從窗口中消失。閱讀我的深入文章。

總統唐納爾·J·特朗普造成了非常危險的內部和跨大西洋崩潰！

迪士尼樂園是這個國家最高的智力貢獻。

這方面只有批評。跨大西洋的關係是極限！特朗普皇帝與歐洲政治領導人和北約夥伴進行對話-長官貴賓犬除了詹斯·斯托爾滕貝格，聽話的北約秘書長唐納德·J·特朗普。老實說，我們不感激！

我們也不重視美國拒絕《 INF條約》並使歐洲脆弱的事實。皇帝的最後誓言是一時興起裁減美軍在德國！一遍又一遍地證明唐納德·J·特朗普總統是我們不信任的人。但是，他應該向真正的總統約翰·肯尼迪（John F. Kennedy）學習，他給了歐洲人，尤其是德國人民在困難時期的希望和方向。但是他沒有！

我們愛這個國家

當她起來時

遙遠的挪威像金子一樣閃閃發光 

她今年43歲，是奧斯陸一家計算機商店的商店經理。一天，四個男人和一個女人進入商店。他們在她為客戶服務的辦公桌前排隊。五人小組中的一位女士走近她，說：“我的硬盤驅動器有問題，”她拿著一個小的便攜式驅動器，“您能幫我修理一下嗎？”她問櫃檯後面的女人。她回答說：“我們在這裡不做這種操作，”但是我當然可以嘗試為您私下修復它，如果您可以接受的話，明天您可以在這裡收集它。”中年婦女同意為這項服務支付40美元。”



 第二天，女人回到商店。商店經理說：“在這裡，我為您固定了驅動器。”女人回答：“我不要！”商店經理說：“但是，為什麼……我們達成協議！”女人就說：“我不要，因為你是私下做的！”

 兩天后，告訴女店長與計算機商店的老闆，律師和她的朋友會面。她來了。她的朋友律師介紹了一個不知名的人。他說：“他是在這里工作的人。我有關於您的投訴。”律師指著他面前桌子上的四封信。這些信是從奧斯陸警察學院（Politiskolen）寄來的。困惑的商店經理回答：“能給我看看嗎？”她伸胳膊收到一封信。律師回答：“對不起，不，您不能看看。”

 商店經理被踢出了商店經理職位。沒有工作，沒有錢，沒有食物。在隨後的三十年中，同一名婦女在街上遭到騷擾，從字面上走下來，竊聽電話，工作被拒絕，工作被破壞，汽車經銷商作為項目的一部分給她的汽車突然從她身邊奪走。在有人打電話給經銷商並給她口臭之後她曾經去過的天主教堂裡的神父和修女被介紹了關於她的虛假故事。一位神父在教堂內襲擊了她。她每週在商店，咖啡館，餐館，公共圖書館和公共場所受到騷擾。

 為什麼今天在挪威會發生這種情況？因為這位誠實的女人曾是挪威最大的報紙《 Aftenposten》和右翼報紙《 Morgenbladet》的記者，並且多年來一直是一名自由職業者，並寫了關於俄羅斯可能滲透到歐洲和平運動中以抗議釋放的報導美國製造的中子炸彈銷往歐洲。她還寫過關於俄羅斯在挪威的行動的文章，並通過她的工作與在奧斯陸的俄羅斯人擦臂。挪威當局和秘密警察不關心違反《聯合國第23條》，工作權和大規模侵犯基本人權的情況。

 這名婦女現在得知另一個國家，另一個挪威“正在崛起”。壓抑和邊緣生活之一。她還活著，但是有多長時間，還不確定。一支警察部隊在凌晨4點將挪威猶太人從床上拖下，擠進他們等待的出租車，然後將其運送到波蘭的納粹滅絕營，這絕對不會讓一個人喪生！他們完全沒有問題，可以讓一個人安德·貝林·布雷維克（Ander Behring Breivik）徹底站起來，無論他在奧斯陸還是在外島（烏托亞）都沒有開槍射擊來阻止他，工黨兒童和青少年度假營。當天有數千名上班的警察中，沒有人有權干預。 “是的，我們熱愛這個崛起的國家……”

挪威人是一個好人。善良的人。一個可以信任的人。這就是為什麼來挪威的人們喜歡在這裡的原因。但是，在集體心理中的某個地方，我不確定這是什麼時候發生的，挪威人必須做出生存選擇。扮演溫柔的失敗者的角色，他們需要更強大的狗的安心支持，或者堅持真正的愛國主義，這種愛國主義足以站得住自己的兩隻腳。足夠可靠，可以被他人信任，足夠強大，不能利用美利堅合眾國的慷慨。

 我們都想賣東西。天氣是54架F-35戰鬥機，服務，石油和天然氣，有時甚至是我們。一些人已經表明，挪威已經有充分的理由成為美國的第51個州。當挪威人唱歌時說：“是的，我們愛這個國家，因為它崛起。”這是有必要問的，他當時指的是哪個國家？這個國家是自由世界的燈塔，美國還是歐洲最外圍的一塊狹長的土地，它正努力成為對自己和人民誠實的不誠實的人？

漲潮時，我們有六個小時的時間來拍攝地震線。這是4471號線。在這裡，我們位於Hendijan的泥灘上，兩邊都是皮帶驅動的車輛，這些車輛分別來自中國石油天然氣集團公司（CNPC）和地球物理勘探局（BGP）。在右側的後面，將兩公斤炸藥向下推至十米，然後引爆。然後，地震檢波器開始接收地震信號。

挪威的寂寞之魂

 她說，她是六十年代的虛弱女性，在挪威生活了四十年。她來自英國，與挪威人結婚。

他去世後，她繼續住在奧斯陸時尚區之一比格多（Bygdøy）的房子裡。 “我在這裡住了四十多年。我從來沒有受到鄰居的邀請，甚至沒有喝咖啡或談話。我丈夫去世後，我感到非常孤獨。”紮根於英國文化的人們容易相處並互相邀請喝茶，這對她而言尤其困難。

 可悲的是，在挪威，尤其是在奧斯陸，很少有人或從未有人邀請過鄰居。確認。 “他們只是孤立自己，因為沒有人在乎，然後他們獨自一人死亡。這是挪威財富，金錢，自然和大肆宣傳的幸福魅力幕牆的背面。奧斯陸主要藥店之一的負責人證實：“自殺率很高，合法化的人越來越多，而且整個社會都在邊緣化。”幾千年來，挪威人互相邀請來喝杯咖啡，而我本人也被邀請來了，但那是遙遠的北方，但現在已經不復存在了。挪威人變得懶惰，自食其力，並且在許多方面對待生活和同胞的方式變得人性化。挪威作為社會幸福展示的神話是一個故事。

挪威的逻辑障碍

总编辑

美国对北越政权的近乎狂热的批评夺去了282,000名美国人的生命，合计1,353,000。 从您自己之外的其他角度对待其他国家可能会带来可怕的后果。 

2000年，挪威怀着雄心壮志进入伊朗，三年后被驱逐出境。 2010年，挪威向刘晓波颁发了诺贝尔和平奖，此后不久，他就被赶出了中国。在这两种情况下，挪威都使用支票簿外交手段向后爬行。

白俄罗斯目前有一位统治者，他知道他想要什么。挪威总理索尔伯格访问了立陶宛维尔纽斯，并会见了反对卢卡申科总统的领导人斯韦特兰娜·蒂哈诺夫斯卡娅。挪威也不喜欢普京总统。地球上陆地面积最大的国家的领导人。但这似乎并不重要。挪威支持香港所谓的民主反对派团体，这些团体将这座城市变成了战区，为自己的“权利”而战。压制香港是祖国的事实。

觸摸圖片播放視頻

Macron一需要一支歐盟聯合軍事力量來使歐洲擺脫美國的威脅，尤其是在特朗普宣布退出冷戰時代的核條約之後。 “我們必須保護自己，不論是中國，俄羅斯甚至是美國，”他告訴歐洲一家廣播公司，他首次暗示歐洲可能需要從美國進行自衛。法國總統已經制定了主要的國防開支，以使法國與北約的支出目標保持一致，正在帶頭建立一支獨立於北約的九國歐洲快速反應部隊。

危險的行為

地方法院法令

親愛的讀者和朋友們！

唐納德·J·特朗普總統已將國民警衛隊和其他可疑人物進入美國城市和州，以維護秩序與和平。該法案不會阻止陸軍國民警衛隊或國家授權的國民警衛隊在其本州或相鄰州內以執法身份行事-關鍵是要受到該州州長的邀請！

通過拒絕尊重擔任州長的人民的意願，總統有意繞開了《波斯國民憲法》的真正含義。要合理。對平民人口使用戰爭型武力是否合理且相稱？不它不是。正如我們所看到的那樣，這將導致無政府狀態，甚至導致更加危險和日益加劇的兩極分化，由此產生的結果是不確定的。我的總統應該在批評美國人之前首先考慮自己的性格。



環顧Barents歐洲北極地區

總編輯

該地區被稱為Barents歐洲北極地區。這個最北端的區域通過挪威，瑞典，芬蘭和俄羅斯與北部邊界向巴倫支海方向延伸。該地區是歐洲大陸的最北端，突然掉入大海，消失了。歐洲大陸突然冰冷的巴倫支海盡頭，這清楚地證實了曾經在這裡發生的地質過程。

挪威最終進入了歐洲巴倫支海

巴倫支歐洲北極地區包括挪威，瑞典，芬蘭和俄羅斯。

眾所周知，歐洲突然之間毫無預警地完成了！親身體驗這個第一手資料會對旅行者產生重大的心理影響，他們敢於走近這個“幽靈般”的區域。特別是在11月，12月和1月之間的冬季。為什麼冬季旅行？我從12月23日至1月6日乘坐Richard S渡輪來回旅行。因此，我申明我有一個“實用的”冬季經歷。北極圈位於南部的兩個奈斯恩站和奧恩山脈之間。再往北。

雄偉的沿海輪渡“理查德·威斯（MS Richard With）”全速駛過大海！

10月19日，俄羅斯北部一個多雨的城市會見了來自Barents World及其他地區的旅行者。歷史悠久的城市阿爾漢格爾斯克再次向世界展示了一些東西-兩國人民的關係及其合作，這對於生活在北方的人們而言是值得注意的。隨著俄羅斯將巴倫支/歐洲北極理事會（BEAC）的主席移交給瑞典，發生了一個重要事件。

等等。從北一站到下一站。下雪了，船慢慢駛過有時是淺海峽。這些沿海渡輪上的船長本身就是也操縱這些船的船長的兒子。船體下方的大沙洲移動，狹窄的通道機動，保持高度警惕。

有光。但這是另一種光。經過北角，歐洲邊緣和北極之間沒有任何東西。風在吹，光線必須遵循自然循環。突然，一個小小的人被與自己比自己大得多的東西的巨大接觸“俘獲”。可以觀看，而不是爭論。沿著挪威海岸的冬季旅行有助於提高心理意識和深度，這是在灰色和弱色光中體驗生活的獨特機會。和冷！ -12至-27之間，風不開。帶一件很厚的冬衣！

沿海地區的人們紛紛前來-邀請您喝咖啡。他們對我做了！ （這僅在冬季，輪渡半滿或半滿，具體取決於您的需求。）食物非常美味，當您越過北極圈時，您將在寬敞的飯廳裡的食客面前在冰水中洗禮

。

數。真冷！旅程結束後，您和我一樣會感到“重生”-並且您將永遠不會忘記剛剛經歷過的爬行動物的大腦。因為此旅程不是大腦認知部分的體驗，也不是迪斯尼樂園的錯覺

核威懾

威懾的定義各不相同，但已故著名學者肯尼思·沃爾茲（Kenneth Waltz）提出了一個普遍的定義，即核武器比常規武器更能可靠地阻止國家參戰。可信度和能力對威懾至關重要，因為它們會影響嚴厲程度和懲戒程度。

特定威懾態勢的可信度是基於對潛在攻擊者的威懾力和威脅的可實現性進行評估的主觀判斷。 MoD用以下術語定義威懾：

令人信服的潛在侵略者認為，脅迫或武裝衝突的後果將超過潛在的收益。這就要求維持具有明確的政治意願採取行動的可信的軍事能力和戰略。政府2013年的《三叉戟替代方案評論》將英國的核力量描述為：

“作為政治手段而不是戰爭手段，這是不得已而為之的手段，它是在危機期間能夠在短時間內向適當規模和非常高的一系列目標發出核打擊的最低核威懾能力。置信度。”

信譽標準

可信和有效的核威懾以五個標準為基礎：可讀性，可及性，解決能力，生存能力/無敵性和破壞力。

擴大威懾力

一個國家的核武庫首先保護那個國家免受外部侵略。因此，核武器與國家主權概念緊密相關。但是，人們普遍同意，核威懾也可以擴大到無核盟國。原則上，所需要的只是核武器國家的一項聲明，即它將對以核手段對其盟友的襲擊進行報復。然而，這種承諾是否會被認為是可信的則完全是另一回事。



沒關係美國傳播什麼，只有來自這一方面的批評，而跨大西洋的關係正處於斷裂點。唐納德·J·特朗普皇帝正在與歐洲政治領導人和北約夥伴進行對話，除了詹森·斯托爾滕貝格，唐納德·J·特朗普的服從的北約秘書長貴賓犬。坦率地說，我們對此不感激。

記者卡爾·伯恩斯坦（Carl Bernstein）週一在美國有線電視新聞網（CNN）的一項調查中稱，唐納德·特朗普總統與德國總理安格拉·默克爾的電話交談“如此不尋常”，以至於德國官員被要求保密。

 消息人士告訴CNN，特朗普以“非常激進”的方式鄙視默克爾，稱她為“愚蠢”，並指責她“在俄羅斯人的口袋裡”。

一位消息人士告訴美國有線電視新聞網：“他在電話中最堅強，在他看來是弱者，而在最弱者中他是最弱者。”

消息人士告訴CNN，儘管為回應特朗普與默克爾的對話採取了特別措施，但德國總理還是採納了美國總統的言論“就像鴨背上的水一樣”。

我們也不讚賞美國退出《 INF協議》並使歐洲脆弱。皇帝的最新口號是一時興起削減美軍在德國！一次又一次地證明唐納德·J·特朗普總統是我們不能信任的人。但是，他本應該從真正的總統約翰·肯尼迪那裡學到的，他給歐洲人，特別是德國人民帶來了困難時期的希望和方向。但是他沒有。

歐洲人將自己決定，歐洲決不能成為美國的附庸國！最終，歐洲的戰術核武器必須由新的歐洲陸軍控制。保持警惕。睜大你的眼睛和耳朵。與國內外恐怖主義作鬥爭祝你有美好的一天。乾杯!

挪威人口得不到任何保護，什麼都沒有！

挪威的新Quislings是個人，對國際刑事法院戰爭罪行法庭負有刑事責任，並應受懲罰 在新戰爭爆發前的幾年中，挪威向左，右和中央派發了和平獎，同時又將本國人口騙向了威脅生命的核角，從那裡沒有生存的希望。 挪威的超級官僚使人民準備死，沒有生存的希望。

巴拉克·奧巴馬（Barack Obama）總統應獲得什麼獎項，而不是由挪威國會選拔的華盛頓諾貝爾委員會（Norwegian Nobel Committee）以外的諾貝爾和平委員會。 這與阿爾弗雷德·諾貝爾（Alfred Nobel）的獎項構想相去甚遠。 圖片：奧巴馬在奧斯陸舉行的諾貝爾頒獎典禮上從諾貝爾委員會主席蓋爾·倫斯塔達上課。

核共享是北約核威懾政策中的一個概念，其中涉及沒有自己的核武器的成員國，例如挪威，計劃由北約使用核武器，特別是為這些國家的武裝部隊提供了條件 在使用這些武器時參與交付這些武器。

在1960年代後期，成立了北約核計劃小組，以解決歐洲希望對美國的核計劃施加影響的願望。 這些核共享安排將緩解歐洲人，尤其是德國人對簽署《不擴散條約》的擔憂。

挪威的新奎斯林

在ICC戰爭犯罪法庭中是個人，刑事責任人並應受懲罰

   第7條

將危害人類罪定義為“在了解攻擊的情況下，作為針對任何平民的廣泛或系統攻擊的一部分而犯下的行為”。

     第8條

根據武裝衝突是國際衝突（通常意味著在國家之間進行戰鬥）還是非國際衝突（通常意味著在非國家行為者（例如反叛團體）之間或在國家與國家之間進行戰鬥）來定義戰爭罪行。 此類非國家行為者）。 第8條列出了總共74項戰爭罪。

CLICK PICTURE FOR THE ICC WEB PAGES

在新戰爭之前的幾年中，挪威向左，右和中央派發了和平獎，同時又將本國人口騙入了威脅生命的核角，沒有生存的希望。 奧斯陸的大佬官僚讓它的人口準備死了！Vidkun Quisling在他的時代也這樣做，他在戰後被處決。

德國哲學家卡爾·賈斯珀斯（Karl Jaspers）：“如果曾經發生過一次，

那就有可能再次發生！” 主編：“如果挪威不是非常非常謹慎，它可能會再次發生。”

Vidkun Quisling：“我真的相信我所做的是正確的事情！”

挪威人口得不到任何保護，什麼都沒有！

挪威的新Quislings是個人，對國際刑事法院戰爭罪行法庭負有刑事責任，並應受懲罰 在新戰爭爆發前的幾年中，挪威向左，右和中央派發了和平獎，同時又將本國人口騙向了威脅生命的核角，從那裡沒有生存的希望。 挪威的超級官僚使人民準備死，沒有生存的希望。



挪威人口

將無法吸收大規模的俄羅斯反擊

下圖：在Zapad-2017演習中，Iskander M導彈在哈薩克斯坦命中目標。 容量增加的導彈飛行了480公里，成功擊中了哈薩克斯坦馬卡特射擊場的目標。

下圖：伊斯坎德爾M平台上的兩枚導彈。 迅速，精確和無情的報復。



我將一如既往地彬彬有禮，首先將這句話告訴對方。希望您能從歷史和地理角度上進行反思，如果您已經忘記了，請允許我仔細地提醒您，直到烏拉爾（Ural）屬於北歐平原的俄羅斯大陸。 70％的俄羅斯人口居住在烏拉爾以西。因此，俄羅斯“本身”是歐洲生活中一個完整，和平與積極的組成部分。

舉起兩個典型的天然氣管道Nord Stream 1和Nord Stream 2就足夠了。德國公司和俄羅斯之間的合作以及俄羅斯公司在德國的合作對兩國和歐洲都至關重要。沒關係美國怎麼說。歐洲人必須自己決定，歐洲決不能成為美國的附庸國。歐洲的戰術核武器必須由新的歐洲陸軍控制。保持警惕。睜大你的眼睛和耳朵。與國內外恐怖主義作鬥爭祝你有美好的一天。乾杯!

 永遠的朋友？

一個人不能通過將狗屎扔在另一側並表現出好像一個人擁有該地方的方式來營造良好的氛圍

一個人不能通過將狗屎扔在另一側並表現出好像一個人擁有該地方的方式來營造良好的氛圍。 圖片來自2003年5月在國家石油公司NIOC總部舉行的挪威與伊朗伊斯蘭共和國上次部長級會議。 左側是伊朗，石油部長是左手Namdahr Zangeneh編號樹閣下。 挪威的右邊是能源和石油部長，埃納·斯坦森斯閣下閣下從右數第六。 照片（C）2003 Harald Dahle-Sladek

Y-12橡樹嶺國家安全中心

Y-12國家安全中心是美國能源部國家核安全管理局的設施，位於田納西州橡樹嶺，靠近橡樹嶺國家實驗室。Y-12國家安全中心由Babcock＆Wilcox Y-12運營 （B＆W Y-12），並由WSI-Oak Ridge保護

你好朋友！ Pantex工廠位於得克薩斯州阿馬里洛（Amarillo）東北，是美國進行核武器最終組裝，拆卸和維護的主要設施。

Pantex是國家核安全局（National Nuclear Security Administration）核安全企業（Nuclear Security Enterprise）的六個生產設施之一。 我們感謝美國為維護歐洲的安全與和平提供的慷慨支持。 保持警惕！ 我們必須團結一致，以一切邪惡手段打擊恐怖主義，並向當局報告可疑活動。 祝你有美好的一天！

核共享是北約核威懾政策中的一個概念，其中涉及沒有自己的核武器的成員國，例如挪威，計劃由北約使用核武器，特別是為這些國家的武裝部隊提供了條件 在使用這些武器時參與交付這些武器。

在1960年代後期，成立了北約核計劃小組，以解決歐洲希望對美國的核計劃施加影響的願望。 這些核共享安排將緩解歐洲人，尤其是德國人對簽署《不擴散條約》的擔憂。

航空之星飛機廠 俄羅斯烏里揚諾夫斯克航空工業園區

主編從迪米特羅夫格勒到伏爾加河附近的薩馬拉，並住在列寧的出生地烏里揚諾夫斯克。 “我們參觀了在冷戰期間生產戰略轟炸機的AVIASTAR飛機工廠，” Harald Dale-Sladek說。

1970年代初期從頭開始設計生產下一代戰略轟炸機，但不清楚哪一個，Ulyanovsk航空生產中心，在1991年11月成為由自己的員工控制的股份制企業後，更名為Aviastar，據說是最大的世界上的航空業生產以及俄羅斯的最新生產。

俄羅斯艦隊將在未來7年內更新70％

 弗拉基米爾·普京（Vladimir Putin）參加了在克里米亞船塢鋪設的兩艘新登陸艦的活動。 幾年前，在克里米亞加入俄羅斯之前，這些造船廠正在衰落。 但是現在俄羅斯艦隊的更新正在緊鑼密鼓地進行中。 普京從克里米亞接觸了聖彼得堡和塞弗德文斯克的造船廠，那裡也正在建造新船。 北約和烏克蘭在黑海開始聯合實踐的明確信號是：最好將它們帶離克里米亞海岸和俄羅斯水域。 俄羅斯的新艦已經擁有新的高超音速武器

 美國是否解除了製裁

在2016年和2018年之間真的發生了嗎？'

尊敬的讀者和朋友們。雖然，有人可以辯稱，所謂的美國製裁在2016年至2018年間確實發生了。但是，有理由相信，當外國資產控制辦公室OFAC對同一時期與伊朗和伊朗資產有業務往來的外國個人進行尖銳而令人不快的調查時，會得出這樣的結論：制裁併不意味著任何事情。”如果您的意圖是在知情的情況下規避美國與伊朗的政治，我們認為這是一個非常糟糕的主意，並且將產生後果。

北流2

允許在丹麥使用錨定舖管機

由俄羅斯天然氣工業股份公司（Gazprom）領導的在俄羅斯波羅的海建造Nord Stream 2天然氣管道的公司Nord Stream 2 AG已獲得丹麥當局的許可，可使用帶錨的管道鋪設船代替動態定位船。Nord Stream 2項目 由兩條平行的管道組成，總長度為1230公里，用於將俄羅斯的天然氣通過波羅的海運輸到德國。

B61-12

如果他們將到達俄羅斯領土，那就是懷疑

北約核

核空軍基地，歐洲，美國核倉庫，美國海軍早

期預警，即時響應相控陣雷達

核空軍基地-歐洲-美國核武器庫，美國海軍-預警預警，即時響應，相控陣雷達



歐洲和美國以及北約之間的深刻分裂不能成為歐洲土地上戰術核武器的守護者。必須由歐洲控制，而不是由美國控制。

Macron一需要一支歐盟聯合軍事力量來使歐洲擺脫美國的威脅，尤其是在特朗普宣布退出冷戰時代的核條約之後。 “我們必須保護自己，不論是中國，俄羅斯甚至是美國，”他告訴歐洲一家廣播公司，他首次暗示歐洲可能需要從美國進行自衛。法國總統已經制定了主要的國防開支，以使法國與北約的支出目標保持一致，正在帶頭建立一支獨立於北約的九國歐洲快速反應部隊。



Они создали государство в государстве. Сами они заявляют, что стоят выше Закона, продолжая при этом беспокоить и разрушать жизни многих людей. За фасадом послушания Закону они продали свой народ иностранной державе. Это люди, которые любят, чтобы на них смотрели и ходили с невероятной смесью тщеславной силы. Это люди, которые подвергли жизни многих людей большой опасности, вызвав иностранные войска и термоядерное оружие на норвежскую землю. История рассудит этих предателей.

ХАРАС И УНИЧТОЖЕНИЕ ЖИЗНИ МНОГИХ

СЕКРЕТНАЯ ПОЛИЦИЯ НОРВЕГИИ РАБОТАЕТ КАК ГОСУДАРСТВО В ГОСУДАРСТВЕ

Война не закончилась. Война, закончившаяся в 1945 году, продолжается по сей день. Норвежская тайная полиция преследует писателей, журналистов и людей, выступающих против беззакония и пренебрежения правами человека в рамках сил тайной полиции, Департамента юстиции Осло и других ведомств. Норвежская полиция и отморозки нарушают §90 параграфа о шпионаже, когда шпионят за собственным населением в рамках программы SIMAS американского посольства.

 ПОЛНОЕ пренебрежение правами человека

Нарушает §90, параграф о шпионаже, норвежский закон, Хартию основных прав Европейского Союза и права человека Организации Объединенных Наций.

Эта беззаконная тайная полиция проникает в католическую церковь и настраивает ее против членов их собственной церкви. Тайная полиция распространяла ложные слухи среди людей, в магазинах, на рабочих местах, чтобы игнорировать и исключать врагов государства. Постукивает по мобильным телефонам и использует полученную информацию, чтобы сделать жизнь как можно более разрушительной. Получайте данные о рейсах от авиакомпаний, чтобы отслеживать их и беспокоить. Следите за людьми за границей. Действует в Испании и других странах с целью подавления оппозиции. Спровоцируйте людей на улицах Осло, проведите их вниз, заблокируйте входы в двери магазинов и прибудьте на рабочие места людей, чтобы спровоцировать проблемы и уволить людей. Они используют дешевую тактику и распространяют слухи о гомосексуализме и других отклонениях, чтобы еще больше дискредитировать людей. Они навещают соседей цели и говорят им, что этот человек - плохой человек. Они делают все возможное, чтобы разрушить жизнь любого, кто придерживается мнения, противоречащего их собственному. Специально для тех, кто будет вести диалог с Россией, а не войну. Вы смотрите на Восток в сегодняшней Норвегии, и вы почти мертвы. Тайная полиция имеет доступ к множеству людей, с которыми они сотрудничают. Они действуют через людей, так что следы их поступков не видны. Предатели истины, прав человека и справедливости.

Тайная полиция Норвегии: «ИСТИНА ТАК, ЧТО МЫ ГОВОРИМ»

 Норвежская нацистская полиция с войны исчезла, но суть зла - нет. Это сегодняшняя Норвегия, на том же уровне, что и в ГДР ГДР при Вальтере Ульбрихте, жизнь при Сталине и в Хорватии при Анте Павелич. В Норвегии есть сияющая демократия - диктатура партийной демократии, которая подрывает реальное процветание и реальные права человека для населения и действует как государство в государстве. Petrofilm.com располагает огромным количеством доказательств деятельности Секретного государства. Это не шутка и не фантастика, это реально. Сегодняшние норвежские квислинги продают население Норвегии и уничтожают оппозицию.

Когда мы имеем дело с людьми, на ум приходят три слова: сочувствие, уважение и достоинство. То, что вы здесь прочтете и посмотрите, является противоположностью этих трех слов, объединенных в один общий лозунг «фашизм». Семя фашизма находится внутри нас, в обществе в целом, и оно ждет, чтобы высунуться в нужный момент под руководством харизматичного фашистского лидера.

В своей собственной работе, посвященной людям и диалогу в целом, я пришел к выводу, что многие из нас не способны смотреть на другого человека прямо перед собой с теплотой, сочувствием и человечностью. Я считаю, что этот дефект является одной из нескольких основных причин дисгармонии, конфликтов и войн. Я называю это явление холодом между людьми.

ТЕКСТЫ, ПЕРЕВЕДЕННЫЕ НА РУССКИЙ ЗДЕСЬ - RUSSIAN TRANSLATED TEXTS PLACED HERE

ЗАЩИТА НАШЕЙ СВОБОДЫ

Президент Джо Байден должен немедленно возобновить ядерные переговоры с Россией и обеспечить продолжающийся мир в Европе, как это сделали до него президент Реган и генеральный секретарь Горбечев.

Многие люди сегодня, в том числе и этот автор, придерживаются мнения, что Соединенным Штатам следует вместо того, чтобы постоянно критиковать некоторые страны и наказывать их вечными санкциями, в первую очередь заняться своими собственными внутренними проблемами! В 1961 году Эрих Фромм, немецкий еврейский социальный психолог, который жил и работал психологом, философом и писателем в Мексике и Соединенных Штатах, а затем в Локарно, Швейцария, опубликовал диссертацию на тему «Может ли человек победить?

 РОССИЯ

 Уважаемые читатели.

Главный редактор искренне считает, что лучше попытаться установить диалог и взаимопонимание с Россией и Китаем на основе сочувствия, уважения и достоинства, чем нагнетать напряженность и рисковать ядерной конфронтацией. По этой простой причине petrofilm.com помимо публикации на английском языке также частично переводится на русский и китайский; Россия в этом контексте означает русских, проживающих на европейской стороне к западу от Уральских гор на Большой европейской равнине. Спасибо за понимание и хорошего дня.

Репортаж главного редактора из Москвы

Постоянный представитель России при НАТО Александр Грушко

Вопрос: Как Россия оценивает намерение США разместить еще одну бронетанковую бригаду в Восточной Европе?

Александр Грушко: Нам нужно посмотреть, как эти намерения реализуются. Тем не менее, мы оцениваем эти планы не только с точки зрения того, что Соединенные Штаты могут дополнительно развернуть на «восточном фланге» НАТО, но и в контексте уже принятых совокупных мер.

Что касается новой схемы размещения сил на «восточной периферии» НАТО, то это предполагает качественное изменение конфигурации этого присутствия и значительное ухудшение ситуации в военной сфере.

В настоящее время силы США постоянно ротации в шести странах Восточной Европы, и постоянно проводятся учения с участием не только американских, но и европейских контингентов. Усилена военно-морская группировка на Балтике. Созданы склады для оборудования, используемого ротационными подразделениями во время совместных учений с национальными контингентами.

Инфраструктура пополнения войск продолжает обновляться. Активизировалась военная активность в воздушном пространстве вдоль наших границ. Резко увеличилось количество разведывательных полетов. Постоянно говорят об увеличении военного присутствия в Черном море.

Все это свидетельствует о том, что политика «сдерживания», которая изначально была провозглашена на словах, теперь сопровождается конкретными решениями военного планирования. Это создает долгосрочную негативную тенденцию не только для региональной безопасности, но и для европейской безопасности в целом.

Другая проблема в том, что никто не знает, как далеко зайдет этот процесс. Решение о развертывании дополнительной бронетанковой бригады объявляется в момент, когда ничего критического с точки зрения интересов НАТО на «восточном фланге» не происходит.

Становится все более очевидным, что эти военные приготовления не имеют под собой реальной основы. Нет прямой угрозы ни Польше, ни странам Балтии, но информационная кампания продолжает набирать обороты.

По-прежнему ходят абсурдные страшилки о том, что Россия напала бы на страны Балтии, если бы НАТО не приняла меры и не разместила свои войска в регионе. Все признаки указывают на серьезное изменение к худшему в военной ситуации.

Вопрос: Есть ли основания говорить, что действия НАТО нарушают договоренности с Россией, в частности Основополагающий акт 1997 года?

Александр Грушко: Дополнительная бронетанковая бригада для усиления «восточного фланга» противоречит духу Основополагающего акта. Между тем НАТО утверждает, что все военные усилия полностью соответствуют Основополагающему акту Россия-НАТО, согласно которому НАТО обязалось не размещать дополнительные значительные боевые силы на постоянной основе.

Мы не раз заявляли, что непрерывная ротация ничем не отличается от постоянного развертывания. Однако должен отметить, что две базы европейского сегмента глобальной системы противоракетной обороны строятся.

База в Румынии сейчас находится в боевой готовности и в мае должна быть передана под командование НАТО. Строительство объекта в Польше продолжается. Базы однозначно подпадают под определение «значимые» и имеют постоянный характер.

Вопрос: Каким образом усиление контингента США повлияет на сотрудничество Россия-НАТО?

Александр Грушко: Ни в коем случае. Нет сотрудничества. В апреле 2014 года страны НАТО приняли решение прекратить всякое сотрудничество с Россией, и все проекты были приостановлены. Сегодня у нас нет позитивной повестки дня с НАТО.

Мы часто слышим, как представители НАТО говорят, что они готовы к диалогу. Диалог через постоянное представительство продолжается. У нас хорошие контакты с руководством альянса, со всеми миссиями в НАТО, но эти контакты не могут заменить сотрудничество Россия-НАТО, которое строилось на протяжении многих лет для обеспечения безопасности всех членов Совета Россия-НАТО в ряде областей.

Мы вместе работали над Афганистаном. Мы проделали большую работу по борьбе с терроризмом не только в плане оценки угроз и обмена опытом, но и в реализации проектов, направленных на исключение трагедий, подобных той, что произошла в Брюсселе.

Вопрос: Каков статус деятельности Совета Россия-НАТО?

Александр Грушко: Формально работа совета не прекращается. По нашей инициативе он был созван на экстренное заседание в июне 2014 года в связи с началом карательной операции киевских властей на юго-востоке Украины. С тех пор никаких встреч не проводилось. Работа над следующей встречей ведется, но решение пока не принято.

Вопрос: Можно ли в нынешней ситуации ссылаться на ДОВСЕ?

Александр Грушко: Наращивание военной мощи США происходит на фоне размывания режима контроля над вооружениями в Европе. Режим ДОВСЕ был краеугольным камнем европейской безопасности. Он устанавливает ограничения для основных категорий систем оружия и обеспечивает эффективный обмен информацией и режим интрузивной проверки.

В начале 1990-х стало ясно, что договор не соответствует новым политическим реалиям, и начались переговоры об адаптации. Эти усилия завершились подписанием адаптированного ДОВСЕ. Это больше соответствовало новым реалиям. В частности, предусматривались конкретные механизмы использования политических инструментов в случае развертывания сил сверх установленных квот.

В 2004 году Россия ратифицировала договор, но страны НАТО затянули с ратификацией под надуманными предлогами. В результате он не вступил в силу. Поскольку ДОВСЕ утратил связь с реальностью, есть основания говорить, что режим контроля над вооружениями в Европе мертв. Это еще больше усугубляет ситуацию с безопасностью. Однако этот выбор сделали сами страны НАТО.

Это «Исследование фактов и вымыслов внешней политики», в котором он анализировал «холодную войну». Фромм отметил, что «обе страны, Соединенные Штаты и Советский Союз, использовали одни и те же прогнозы, чтобы воспринимать друг друга как врага и аргументировать конец этому опасному противостоянию. На фотографии слева изображен Эрих Фромм в 1971 году, работающий над рукописью в своей квартире в Локарно, Швейцария. На рисунке ниже показаны американские и российские танки между бочками на Фридрихштрассе, западный Берлин, Восточная Германия, с 4 по 9 июня 1961 года. Потенциально чрезвычайно опасная ситуация.

Это во многом аналогично сегодняшней ситуации в регионе Персидского залива и продолжающейся эскалации конфронтации между НАТО и Россией из-за Украины.

Президент Рональд Рейган и лидер Советского Союза Михаил С. Горбачев в знаменательный момент в послевоенной истории подписали договор о запрещении ядерных ракет средней дальности и начали переговоры о сокращении количества более опасного стратегического оружия большой дальности. Рейган и Горбачев, лидеры ведущих капиталистических и коммунистических обществ мира, сели рядом, чтобы подписать соглашение под чешскими хрустальными люстрами Восточного зала.

 Рациональный бардак в Норвегии

Утверждалось, что в случае усиления напряженности и войны между Россией и НАТО Норвегия получит гарантированную поддержку со стороны Соединенных Штатов и других партнеров НАТО здесь, в Европе. Правительство Норвегии вложило в этот пакт весь свой престиж и силу. Норвежское общество и его способность выжить в военное время зависят от быстрого развертывания иностранных войск и дополнительных военных материалов. По крайней мере, так это выглядит на бумаге!

В действительности, когда российская доктрина превентивного удара будет в полном разгаре, Норвегия внезапно и без предупреждения окажется застигнутой врасплох. Затем последовал столь же быстрый ультиматум, поскольку российский Северный флот уже достиг Медвежьего острова (Бьёрнёйа) и закрыл брешь между сушей и льдом. Северная часть Северного моря, Норвежское море и Баренцево море в настоящее время являются доминирующей территорией России. Норвегия изолирована. Почему этот сценарий верен? За последние сорок лет НАТО спало, ссорилось и из-за американского высокомерия было значительно ослаблено и перетянуто. В пользу России и в ущерб Норвегии. Идея о том, что Норвегия будет спасена иностранными войсками НАТО и Соединенными Штатами Америки, является надуманным беспорядком, который дорого обойдется норвежскому населению.

Дорогие читатели и друзья!

Теперь мы можем ясно видеть; дождь ушел! Джо Байден защитит нашу свободу, поддержит НАТО и наладит трансатлантические связи. После многих лет оскорбительных выражений и угроз отказа от сотрудничества с союзниками Европа с нетерпением ждет Нового курса, позитивного двустороннего торгового взаимодействия и общего направления в оборонной политике. Европа и Соединенные Штаты должны работать в одном направлении, проявляя сочувствие друг к другу, уважая людей и достоинство в рамках закона и порядка. Да благословит Бог Джозефа Робинетта Байдена-младшего, его семью и нового президента Соединенных Штатов Америки. Удачного дня!

Норвежский Нобелевский комитет злоупотребил своей властью и использовал награду в политическом контексте для продвижения повестки дня нор

вежского парламента Стортингета. В 2003 году они начали сотрудничать с Ираном, а семь лет спустя - с Китайской Народной Республикой. Оба этих примера доказывают, что норвежский парламент, норвежский Нобелевский комитет и министерство иностранных дел Осло серьезно не имеют опыта в установлении устойчивого диалога и консенсуса по международным отношениям. В этом случае вклад Норвегии в Совет Безопасности Организации Объединенных Наций на общее благо Организации Объединенных Наций остается для нас загадкой.

Северный поток II должен быть завершен ЕВРОПА НЕ ЯВЛЯЕТСЯ ВАЗАЛЕМ СОЕДИНЕННЫХ ШТАТОВ Друзья навсегда? ТРАНСАТЛАНТИЧЕСКИЕ ОТНОШЕНИЯ НА ПЕРЕКРЕСТКЕ - НОВАЯ ЕВРОПЕЙСКАЯ АРМИЯ С 2024 ГОДА - ГЕРМАНИЯ ФРАНЦИЯ БЕЛЬГИЯ ИТАЛИЯ ЧЕРНАЯ ПОЧТА НА ЕГО СЕПАПЕШТЕ!

Nord Stream II - это европейский промышленный проект для Европы с четырьмя национальностями. Для другой страны, такой как США, неслыханно пытаться остановить проект и навязать свою волю европейцам, чтобы смешать политику и промышленные проекты, и продавать свой более дорогой газ Европе. Это самый дешевый и опасный шантаж. Соединенные Штаты манипулируют европейскими странами друг против друга.