ANALYSIS INFORMATION FROM A EUROPEAN PERSPECTIVE

PETROFILM.COM

INTEGRITY  EMPATHY  RESPECT  DIGNITY

Harald Dahle-Sladek

Founder and Editor-in-chief

 Основатель и главный редактор

 創始人兼總編輯



NORWAY TERROR ATTACKS AS FALS FLAG OPERATIONS?

NATO REVENGE FOR NORWAY'S STANDOWN IN THE LIBYA BOMBING?

Norway Terror Attacks a False Flag!

More Than One Shooter on the Island; Oslo Police Drilled Bomb Blasts; Was It NATO’s Revenge for Norway’s Decision to Stop Bombing Libya?

by Webster G. Tarpley, Ph.D.

Washington DC, – The tragic terror attacks in Norway display a number of the telltale signs of a false flag provocation. It is reported that, although the world media are attempting to focus on Anders Behring Breivik as a lone assassin in the tradition of Lee Harvey Oswald, many eyewitnesses agree that a second shooter was active in the massacre at the Utøya summer youth camp outside of Oslo.

It has also come to light that a special police unit had conducted drills or exercises near the opera house in downtown Oslo which involved the detonation of bombs during 2010– exactly what caused the bloodshed a few hundred meters away this Friday. Further research reveals that United States intelligence agencies had been conducting a large-scale program of recruiting retired Norwegian police officers with the alleged purpose of conducting surveillance inside the country. This program, known as SIMAS Surveillance Detection Units, provided a perfect vehicle for the penetration and subversion of the Norwegian police by NATO.

A motive for the attack is also present: as part of its attempt to mount an independent foreign policy, including the imminent diplomatic recognition of a Palestinian state as part of a general rapprochement with the Arab world, Norway was leading the smaller NATO states in dropping out of the imperialist aggressor coalition currently bombing Libya. Norway was scheduled to stop all bombing and other sorties against the Gaddafi forces as out of August 1 at the latest.

Finally, the CIA limited hangout operation known as Wikileaks has already furnished a prefabricated off-the-shelf case for incompetence and malfeasance against the current Norwegian government that is doing all these things – in the form of a series of real or doctored dispatches which document the alleged negligence of this government in dealing with the terrorist threat, all in the view of US State Department officials.

VG of Oslo: “Several” Eyewitnesses Say there were Two Shooters on the Island

As noted, world press and media of the Anglo-American school have immediately battened onto Breivik as an archetypal lone assassin cast in the mold of Lee Harvey Oswald, Sirhan Sirhan, and so many others. The problem for the terror mythographs is that , in most of these cases, there is credible to overwhelming evidence that these figures could not have acted alone.

Among more recent loan assassins, Breivik could be compared to Major Nidal Hasan of Fort Hood, Texas, whose shooting spree dates back to November 2009. Hasan is accused of having killed seven people. At the time, it was considered remarkable that Hasan had managed to kill so many armed soldiers on the military base. But early reports suggested that there were one or two other shooters in addition to Hasan. As usually happens, these extra shooters were soon expunged from the hegemonic media narrative.

In the Norwegian case, the evidence that Breivik was not alone in claiming his fearful toll of victims is clear and convincing. Here are some excerpts from a report published by the Oslo newspaper VG:

“Several of the youths who were at the Utøya the shooting drama, told VG that they are convinced that there must have been more than one perpetrator. Marius Helander Røset believes the same thing: – I am sure that there was shooting from two different places on the island at the same time, he said.

Witnesses: – There were two people

Police believe Anders Behring Breivik (32) is the perpetrator who was dressed as a policeman , and have charged him for two terrorist attacks. Young people interviewed by VG describe an additional perpetrator – who was not wearing a police uniform. The person was following them around was 180 centimeters tall, had thick dark hair and a Nordic appearance. He had a pistol in his right hand and a rifle on his back. – I believe that there were two people who were shooting, says Alexander Stavdal (23)….

At the press conference Saturday morning opened the police said that there could have been several perpetrators and emphasized that there is an ongoing investigation.”

The presence of a second shooter is of course most inconvenient for the lone assassin theory, since it represents incontrovertible evidence of a criminal conspiracy, the very thing which the media coverage is usually anxious to avoid. In the Norwegian case, the reports of a second shooter seemed to be persistent enough 36 hours after the main event so as to hold out some hope that the entire official version can be brought down on this particular.

Police Had Drilled Setting off Bombs in Same Area During 2010

Another telltale critical sign of a false flag operation is the holding of drills or exercises –allegedly for counterterrorism purposes — by the police or the military at the same time as the terror attack, or shortly before the real terror attack begins. Sometimes, the terror drills or exercises are scheduled to begin slightly after the time when the actual terror attack occurs. For large-scale terror actions, which the Norway attacks were, it is not uncommon for the drills to occur well in advance – 9/11, for example, was the result of capabilities which had been built up over a period of several years, as well as of future drills stretching well into 2002. In these cases, it is often discovered that the self-styled anti-terror drill or exercise contains a simulated action or event which strongly resembles the real world terror attack, the one which actually kills people.

The media will then refer to an astounding coincidence or a weird happenstance, but the reality is that the terror drill has been taken live or flipped live in the form of real killings. Once the drill has occurred, the capabilities, hardware, etc., which it has created can remain in place to be mobilized at the desired moment. The secret is that the legally sanctioned drill has been used to conduit or bootleg the actual butchery through a government bureaucracy whose resources are required to run the terror but in which there are many officials who cannot be allowed to know what is happening.

The Norway events provide a very clear illustration of this principle. In Oslo, a powerful bomb went off in or near the building which houses the office of the Prime Minister. Exactly as we would expect, special anti-terror police had been drilling setting off bombs in a nearby part of the Norwegian capital in advance, specifically during 2010. The public had not been informed in advance, but found out what was happening when they began hearing bombs in the opera house district, less than a kilometer away from the prime minister’s office which was attacked on Friday.

Here is a report from the newspaper Aftenposten:

“Armed police were seen in the area around the opera house in Oslo, and violent explosions could be heard over large parts of the city. No one knew that this was all a matter of practice. The Information Section of the Oslo police deeply regrets that the public was not made aware of the seemingly dramatic exercise….It was the emergency squad, the national police special unit against terrorism, which was conducting a drill in the cordoned off area at Bjørvika pier. According to a press release from the police, nearly a day after the exercise, the drill consisted of training in the controlled detonation of explosive charges….The exercise will continue for the rest of Wednesday night and a few more explosions are expected….The exercise followed a familiar pattern for all anti-terror forces around the world: The men lowered themselves down from the ceiling and into through the window that had just been blown out, while they fired hand their weapons.”

Peter Power of Visor Consultants told BBC Radio Five in the wake of the London subway bombings of July 7, 2005 that his firm had been conducting an exercise based on explosions going off in substantially the same stations of the London underground at the same times when the real explosions had actually occurred. The Norwegian events exhibit the same kind of strange coincidence.

A Motive: Norway Had Decided to Stop Bombing Libya August 1

The targets of the Norwegian terror attacks are all expressly political, including government offices and a summer youth camp of the ruling Labor Party, and thus point in the direction of politics. The government of Norway is currently a coalition composed of the Labor Party, the Socialist Left Party, and the Center Party. Norway has traditionally attempted to cultivate a pro-Arab foreign policy, as seen in its sponsorship of the Oslo peace accords between Israeli Prime Minister Rabin and Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat in the mid-1990s. The current government has announced its intention of granting diplomatic recognition to a Palestinian state in the near future. When the destabilization of Libya began last February, the Norwegian Foreign Minister Jonas Gahr Støre of the Labor Party warned Norway’s partners in the NATO alliance against getting involved.

But soon after this, Norway gave in to US pressure and agreed to participate in NATO’s bombing of Libya for an initial period of three months, sending six planes which have carried out an estimated 10% of all the bombing raids mounted by the Atlantic alliance. However, as the end of its three-month commitment had passed, Norway had reduced its contingent to four planes during the month of July, and had announced on June 10 that it was planning to withdraw altogether from the NATO bombing coalition no later than August 1.

The Norwegian decision to drop out of the NATO attack coalition was associated with a similar move by the Netherlands, which was announced on that same day of June 10. The Dutch had decided to maintain their contingent of six planes, but will no longer take part in bombing attacks on ground targets. Henceforth, the Dutch are willing only to help enforce the no-fly zone through air interdiction. There was therefore the potential that Norway’s example could trigger a general tendency by the smaller NATO states to quit the bombing coalition, in which their collective presence is highly significant.

Leading figures of the Norwegian government were among the first to undercut the supposed rationale for the NATO bombing, while urging negotiations: ‘”The solution to the problems in Libya are political, they cannot be solved by military means alone,” Norwegian Prime Minister Stoltenberg told reporters gathered for a conference in Oslo on May 13. “We are very much supporting all efforts to find a political solution to the challenges we are facing in Libya,” he added. Norway’s government …pledged to scale down its role in NATO-orchestrated air strikes on Libya after its current three-month commitment ends on June 24.

This was the policy of the entire Norwegian government: ‘Norway will scale down its fighter jet contribution in Libya from six to four planes and withdraw completely from the NATO-led operation by Aug. 1, the government said Friday…. Defense Minister Grete Faremo said she expects understanding from NATO allies because Norway has a small air force and cannot “maintain a large fighter jet contribution during a long time.” Norway’s air force, meanwhile says its F-16 jets have carried out about 10 percent of the NATO airstrikes in Libya since March 31. The parties in Norway’s center-left coalition government had been at odds over whether to extend the country’s participation, which was scheduled to expire June 24. The most leftist faction in the government, the Socialist Left Party, opposed an extension, but a compromise was reached to stay in the operation until Aug. 1 with fewer planes. “It is wise to end the Norwegian fighter jet contribution. Now Norway should apply its efforts to find a peaceful solution in Libya,” Socialist Left Party lawmaker Baard Vegar Solhjell said.’

State Department Complained of Norway’s “Lack of Commitment” to Libyan Adventure

The Norwegian decision to stop waging war against Libya, the first of its kind by any member of the Atlantic alliance, has attracted the attention of diplomatic observers, one of whom commented that the current government in Oslo has advocated “a distinctly more peaceful approach to global policies by the Norwegian government…. [despite] recent pressure from the US on Norway to contribute more in Libya military campaign.

Norway has been resisting that pressure and pushing for a more peaceful approach to the US-led NATO attacks on Libya and refused to provide weapons to NATO, finally announcing last month that Norway would quit its military role in Libya by August 1. In March, as the US was rallying unilateral support to invade Libya, Norway’s minister of foreign affairs Jonas Gahr Støre was one of the few nations to warn the US against armed intervention in Libya. Norway initially supplied six fighter jets for Libya operations and has carried out about 10% of the Libya strikes since 19 March. However, US officials singled out Norway and Denmark for their ‘lack of commitment’ to the mission to oust Gaddafi… Other Norway-Libya links include Norway’s major oil- and fertilizer-related interests in Libya: the Norwegian state-owned Statoil, which has about 30 employees at its Tripoli offices….[Norway’s] businesses have conducted major business operations in Libya, in co-operation with Qaddafi’s regime.”

At the present stage of the inquiry, the best estimate of a motive for the Norwegian attacks is to punish the country for its independent and pro-Arab foreign policy in general, and for its repudiation of the NATO bombing coalition arrayed against Libya in particular.

Are SIMAS Surveillance Detection Units the New Gladio for Norway?

US and NATO intelligence have been shown to possess extraordinary capabilities inside Norway, many of which may be operating outside of the control of the Norwegian government. In early November 2010, the Oslo television channel TV2 exposed the existence of an extensive network of paid assets and informants of US intelligence recruited from the ranks of retired police and other officials. The ostensible goal of this program was the surveillance of Norwegians who were taking part in demonstrations and other activities critical of the United States and its policies.

One of the Norwegians recruited was the former chief of the anti-terror section of the Oslo police. Although the goal was supposedly merely surveillance, it is possible to imagine some other and far more sinister activities that could be carried out by such a network of retired cops, including the identification and subversion of rotten apples on the active-duty police force. Some of the capabilities of a network of this type would not be totally alien to the sort of events that have just occurred in Norway.

The official name for the type of espionage cell which the United States was creating in Norway is Surveillance Detection Unit (SDU). The SDUs in turn operate within the framework of the Security Incident Management Analysis System (SIMAS). SIMAS is known to be used for spying and surveillance by US Embassies not just in the Nordic bloc of Norway, Denmark, and Sweden, but worldwide. The terror events also raise the question of whether SIMAS has an operational dimension. Could this apparatus represents a modern version of the Cold War stay behind networks set up in all NATO countries and best-known under the name of the Italian branch, Gladio?

The Norwegian government needs to find out. Thus far Norwegian ministers have asserted that they never approved the SIMAS network of SDUs. “We never knew about it,” claimed Norway’s Justice Minister Knut Storberget and Foreign Minister Jonas Gahr Støre in chorus. Hillary Clinton stated instead that the Norwegians had been informed.

CIA’s Wikileaks Limited Hangout Has Rationale for Toppling Norway’s Government

Thanks to document dumps by the CIA limited hangout subsidiary generally known as Wikileaks, an obvious path for using the Norwegian terror attacks as a rationale for overthrowing the current government has already been provided. Real or doctored State Department cables obligingly made available by Wikileaks portray the Norwegian government which NATO hates as a collection of bunglers and misfits, unable to take effective measures to safeguard the national security of the country.

Some of these tables have been published in the immediate wake of the terror attacks by the London Daily Telegraph, a newspaper reputedly close to NATO intelligence circles. According to this article, while ‘talking about an attempt by the Police Security Service (PST) to track one particular suspected Al Qaeda terror cell, a cable written by the US Ambassador to Norway, Barry White, describes [how Norwegian authorities] … refused the help of the UK authorities to put surveillance on a potential suspect and adds: “Not only will they not put their own resources on him…but they also just turned down the visiting UK intel service’s offer of two twelve-person surveillance teams.”

The cable goes on to say the UK and US intelligence services analyzed coded conversation between terror suspects and decided it warranted surveillance. But, says the cable, “PST instead found a way to interpret the same translated coded conversation in a rosier, less threatening light, an interpretation which makes little sense to the US or UK.”’ A catalog of even the most recent failures and fiascos of the FBI and the CIA in the so-called Global War on Terror would help to put these hypocritical judgments into proper perspective, but it would also be too voluminous to be appended here.

Another damaging particular appears made to order for an attempt to blame the alleged bungling of the Norwegian government for the Oslo bomb attack: ‘The memo also reveals how, despite apparently having surveillance on the suspect, the PST lost track of bomb-making equipment which was being stored in an apartment after it was apparently removed without investigators’ noticing. The PST then failed to track one suspect for 14 days because the investigator assigned to him was called away on another job. The memo concludes: “The PST is in over its head…it simply cannot keep up.”’

Another State Department memo dished up by Wikileaks, supposedly written in 2007… adds: “The official police (PST) threat evaluation…states that international terror organizations are not a direct threat against Norway. A memo written in 2008 shows how the US felt that Norway was not awake to the possibility of a potential terrorist attack. The cable reads: “We repeatedly press Norwegian authorities to take terrorism seriously. We will seek to build on this momentum to fight the still-prevalent feeling that terrorism happens elsewhere, not in peaceful Norway.” And a cable written just last year adds: “The PST still viewed Denmark as more of a target than Norway, for reasons very specific to the cartoon controversy.” 

The government of Norway needs to go on the offensive and establish the whole truth of what has just occurred. Otherwise, that government is likely to succumb to the internationally orchestrated campaign which the Wikileaks documents so clearly foreshadow.

Террор в Норвегии атакует под ложным флагом!

Более чем один стрелок на острове; Полиция Осло просверлила взрывы бомб; Была ли это месть НАТО за решение Норвегии прекратить бомбардировки Ливии?

Вебстер Г. Тарпли, доктор философии.

Вашингтон, округ Колумбия, - Трагические террористические акты в Норвегии демонстрируют ряд явных признаков провокации под ложным флагом. Сообщается, что, хотя мировые СМИ пытаются сосредоточить внимание на Андерсе Беринге Брейвике как на убийце-одиночке в традициях Ли Харви Освальда, многие очевидцы сходятся во мнении, что второй стрелок принимал участие в бойне в летнем молодежном лагере Утойя за пределами Осло. .

Также стало известно, что специальное полицейское подразделение провело учения или учения возле оперного театра в центре Осло, в ходе которых в 2010 году были взорваны бомбы - именно это стало причиной кровопролития в нескольких сотнях метров оттуда в эту пятницу. Дальнейшее исследование показывает, что спецслужбы США проводили широкомасштабную программу вербовки вышедших на пенсию норвежских полицейских с предполагаемой целью наблюдения внутри страны. Эта программа, известная как SIMAS Surveillance Detection Units, стала идеальным средством для проникновения в норвежскую полицию и ее подрывной деятельности со стороны НАТО.

Мотив нападения также присутствует: в рамках своей попытки провести независимую внешнюю политику, включая неизбежное дипломатическое признание палестинского государства в рамках общего сближения с арабским миром, Норвегия лидировала в сокращении меньших государств НАТО. из коалиции империалистических агрессоров, которые в настоящее время бомбят Ливию. Норвегия должна была прекратить все бомбардировки и другие вылазки против сил Каддафи не позднее 1 августа.

Наконец, ограниченная операция ЦРУ, известная как Wikileaks, уже предоставила заранее подготовленное готовое дело о некомпетентности и должностных преступлениях против нынешнего норвежского правительства, которое делает все эти вещи - в виде серии реальных или подделанных депеш, которые документально подтверждают предполагаемая халатность этого правительства в борьбе с террористической угрозой - все это по мнению официальных лиц Госдепартамента США.

В.Г. Осло: «Несколько» очевидцев говорят, что на острове было два стрелка

Как уже отмечалось, мировая пресса и средства массовой информации англо-американской школы немедленно выделили Брейвика как архетипического убийцу-одиночку, слепленного по образцу Ли Харви Освальда, Сирхана Сирхана и многих других. Проблема мифографов о терроризме состоит в том, что в большинстве этих случаев существуют убедительные или неопровержимые доказательства того, что эти цифры не могли действовать в одиночку.

Среди недавних наемных убийц Брейвика можно сравнить с майором Нидалом Хасаном из Форт-Худ, штат Техас, чьи перестрелки начались в ноябре 2009 года. Хасана обвиняют в убийстве семи человек. В то время считалось примечательным, что Хасану удалось убить так много вооруженных солдат на военной базе. Но ранние сообщения предполагали, что помимо Хасана были еще один или два других стрелка. Как обычно бывает, эти лишние стрелки вскоре были исключены из гегемонистского нарратива СМИ.

В случае с Норвегией доказательства того, что Брейвик был не единственным, заявившим о своем ужасающем количестве жертв, ясны и убедительны. Вот несколько выдержек из отчета, опубликованного Осло газетой VG:

«Несколько молодых людей, которые были на съемках драмы в Утойе, сказали VG, что они убеждены, что преступников должно быть несколько. Мариус Хеландер Рёсет считает то же самое: - Я уверен, что стрельба велась из двух разных мест на острове одновременно, - сказал он.

Свидетели: - Было два человека.

Полиция считает, что преступником является Андерс Беринг Брейвик (32 года), который был одет как полицейский, и предъявили ему обвинение в двух террористических актах. Молодые люди, опрошенные VG, описывают еще одного преступника - на котором не было полицейской формы. Человек, который шел за ними, был ростом 180 сантиметров, имел густые темные волосы и скандинавскую внешность. В правой руке у него был пистолет, за спиной - винтовка. - Я считаю, что стреляли два человека, - говорит Александр Ставдал (23)….

На открывшейся в субботу утром пресс-конференции полиция заявила, что преступников могло быть несколько, и подчеркнула, что расследование продолжается ».

Присутствие второго стрелка, конечно, наиболее неудобно для теории одинокого убийцы, поскольку представляет собой неопровержимое доказательство преступного заговора, как раз того, чего СМИ обычно стараются избежать. В случае с Норвегией отчеты второго стрелка казались достаточно постоянными через 36 часов после главного события, чтобы дать некоторую надежду на то, что вся официальная версия может быть опровергнута именно по этому поводу.

Полиция учила запускать бомбы в том же районе в 2010 году

Еще одним характерным признаком операции под ложным флагом является проведение полицией учений или учений, предположительно в целях борьбы с терроризмом.

  挪威恐怖襲擊假旗！
   島上不止一個射手；奧斯陸警察爆炸炸彈；

  是北約對挪威停止轟炸利比亞的決定的報復嗎？

 Webster G. Tarpley博士

華盛頓特區，–挪威的悲劇性恐怖襲擊顯示出許多假旗挑釁的明顯跡象。據報導，儘管世界媒體試圖將李·哈維·奧斯瓦爾德（Lee Harvey Oswald）傳統上的刺客安德斯·貝林·布雷維克（Anders Behring Breivik）視為獨行刺客，但許多目擊者一致認為，第二名槍手活躍於奧斯陸郊外烏托亞夏令營的大屠殺中。

還發現，一個特別警察部隊在奧斯陸市中心的歌劇院附近進行了演習或演習，這涉及2010年期間的炸彈爆炸-正是造成這一星期五數百米外流血事件的原因。進一步的研究表明，美國情報機構一直在進行一項大規模計劃，招募退休的挪威警察，據稱目的是在國內進行監視。該計劃被稱為SIMAS監視檢測單元，為北約滲透和顛覆挪威警察提供了理想的工具。

襲擊的動機也存在：作為其製定獨立外交政策的嘗試的一部分，包括即將與外交上承認巴勒斯坦國的外交，作為與阿拉伯世界全面和解的一部分，挪威領導著較小的北約國家放棄帝國主義侵略者聯盟目前正在轟炸利比亞。挪威計劃最遲於8月1日停止對卡扎菲部隊的所有轟炸和其他出擊。

最後，被稱為Wikileaks的CIA有限度視頻群聊行動，已經針對現任挪威政府在做所有這些事情時的無能和瀆職行為，提供了預製的現成案例，形式是一系列實際或篡改的派遣文件，美國國務院官員認為，政府涉嫌疏於應對恐怖威脅。

奧斯陸VG：“幾個”目擊者說島上有兩名射手

如前所述，這家英美學校的世界媒體和媒體立即將其作為典型的刺客刺入布列維克的行列，刺客是李·哈維·奧斯瓦爾德（Lee Harvey Oswald），Sirhan Sirhan等人的模範。恐怖神話傳說的問題在於，在大多數情況下，有可信的壓倒性證據表明這些人物不可能單獨行動。

在最近的貸款刺客中，布雷維克可以與得克薩斯州胡德堡的尼達爾·哈桑少校相提並論，後者的射擊狂歡可追溯到2009年11月。哈桑被指控殺害了7人。當時，哈桑設法在軍事基地殺死了這麼多武裝士兵，這被認為是了不起的。但是早期的報導表明，除了哈桑，還有其他一兩個射手。通常情況下，這些多餘的射手很快就從霸權媒體的敘述中被刪除。

在挪威一案中，有證據表明，布雷維克並不孤單地聲稱自己對受害者造成了可怕的傷亡。以下是奧斯陸報紙VG發布的一份報告的摘錄：

“在烏托亞射擊戲中的幾個年輕人告訴VG，他們堅信一定會有不止一名肇事者。馬里烏斯·海蘭德·羅塞特（Marius HelanderRøset）相信同一件事：–我相信，島上同時有兩個不同的地方在射擊。

目擊者：–有兩個人

警察認為，安德斯·貝林·布雷維克（Anders Behring Breivik）（32歲）是扮成警察的肇事者，並因兩次恐怖襲擊指控他。 VG採訪的年輕人描述了另外一個肇事者–他沒有穿警察制服。跟隨他們的人身高180厘米，濃密的黑髮和北歐的外觀。他的右手有手槍，背上有步槍。 –我相信有兩個人在射擊，亞歷山大·斯塔夫達爾（23歲）說。

在周六早上舉行的新聞發布會上，警察說可能有幾名肇事者，並強調正在進行調查。”

當然，第二個射手的存在對於唯一的刺客理論來說是最不便的，因為它代表了犯罪陰謀的無可辯駁的證據，媒體急需避免這種情況。在挪威的情況下，第二槍手的報導似乎在主要事件發生後36個小時就足夠持久了，以期使人們希望整個官方版本都可以被忽略。

警方在2010年曾在同一地區進行鑽孔引爆炸彈

假旗操作的另一個重要的信號是警察舉行演習或練習（據說是為了反恐目的）

 NORWAY IN RETROSPECT

Norway: To be what it is not, honest to itself and to its people?

A Police force that dragged Norwegian Jews out of bed at 4AM, squeezed them into waiting taxies, and shipped them to Nazi extermination camps in Poland has no problem with taking the life of one, single individual! The German philosopher Karl Jaspers has formulated it this way, "If it has happened once, it can happen again!"

  A silent coup d'état?

the day Anders Behring Breivik succeeded! Military guard the Parliament "Stortinget" on the day of

Anders Behring Breivik's vendetta.

 The Police had no problems with establishing a complete stand-down to let one single man, Anders Behring Breivik take all the lives he possible wished for, without one single shot being fired to stop him, neither in Oslo nor on the Out Island (Utøya) Labor Party holiday camp for teenagers. Among several thousand police at work that day, not one was authorized to interfere. “Yes, we love this Country as it rises forth…”

In the years that followed, Norway's Police Force was upgraded with new BMW cars, surveillance helicopters, new clothing a complete new Emergency Center, and a massive appearance of police specially in the Capital Oslo. The Police State was firmly back!

The Norwegian is a good person. A kind person. And a person one can trust. This is why people who come to Norway enjoy being here. But somewhere in the collective psyche, and I am not sure at what time it happened, the Norwegian had to make an existential choice; take upon himself the role of the meek underdog who need the reassuring support of a stronger dog, or to adhere to real patriotism who is strong enough to stand on one’s own two feet. Reliable enough to be trusted by others and honest enough  not to exploit the generosity of the United States of America.

 We all want to sell something. Weather it is 54 F-35 fighter jets, services, oil, and gas, or in some cases us. It has been indicated by some that Norway has become the 51^st state of the United States, and with good reason. When the Norwegian sing, “Yes, we love this Country as it rises forth,” it is pertinent to ask, which country is he then referring to? The country, which is the Beacon of the Free World, the United States of America, or a tiny, barren strip of land at the outermost edge of Europe which is trying hard to be what it is not, honest to itself and to its people?

НОРВЕГИЯ В РЕТРОСПЕКТЕ
Норвегия: Быть тем, кем не является, честным перед собой и своим народом?

Полиция, которая в 4 часа утра вытаскивала норвежских евреев из постели, заставляла их ждать в такси и отправляла в нацистские лагеря смерти в Польше, без труда лишила жизни одного человека. Немецкий философ Карл Ясперс сформулировал это так: «Если это случилось однажды, это может повториться!»

Тихий государственный переворот?

День, когда Андерс Беринг Брейвик добился успеха!

Военная гвардия Парламента "Стортинг" в день

Вендетта Андерса Беринга Брейвика.



У полиции не было проблем с установлением полного сопротивления, чтобы позволить одному-единственному мужчине, Андерсу Берингу Брейвику, лишить себя всех жизней, которых он мог желать, без единого выстрела, чтобы остановить его, ни в Осло, ни на Внешнем острове (Утоя ) Лейбористский лагерь отдыха для подростков. Среди нескольких тысяч полицейских, работавших в тот день, ни одной не было разрешено вмешиваться. «Да, мы любим эту страну, когда она поднимается…»
 
В последующие годы полиция Норвегии была модернизирована новыми автомобилями BMW, вертолетами наблюдения, новой одеждой, полностью новым центром экстренной помощи и массовым появлением полиции, особенно в столице Осло. Полицейское государство твердо вернулось!
 
Норвежец - хороший человек. Добрый человек. И человек, которому можно доверять. Вот почему людям, которые приезжают в Норвегию, нравится здесь. Но где-то в коллективной психике, и я не уверен, в какое время это произошло, норвежец должен был сделать экзистенциальный выбор; взять на себя роль кроткого неудачника, нуждающегося в обнадеживающей поддержке более сильной собаки, или придерживаться настоящего патриотизма, который достаточно силен, чтобы стоять на собственных ногах. Достаточно надежный, чтобы ему доверяли другие, и достаточно честный, чтобы не использовать щедрость Соединенных Штатов Америки.
 
 Все мы хотим что-то продать. Погода это 54 истребителя F-35, службы, нефть и газ, а в некоторых случаях мы. Некоторые отмечают, что Норвегия стала 51-м штатом США, и не без оснований. Когда норвежец поет: «Да, мы любим эту страну, когда она растет», уместно спросить, о какой стране он тогда имеет в виду? Страна, являющаяся Маяком свободного мира, Соединенные Штаты Америки или крошечная бесплодная полоска земли на самом дальнем краю Европы, которая изо всех сил пытается быть тем, чем она не является, честной перед собой и своим народом. ?

挪威回顧

挪威：對自己和人民誠實，要成為一個不是真正的人？

一支警察部隊在凌晨4點將挪威猶太人拖下床，將他們擠進等候的出租車中，然後將其運到波蘭的納粹滅絕集中營，這樣就不會喪生一個人。德國哲學家卡爾·賈斯珀斯（Karl Jaspers）就是這樣說的：“一旦發生，它就可以再次發生！”



挪威回顧 挪威：

對自己和人民誠實，要成為一個不是真正的人？

軍事守衛當天的議會“ Stortinget” Anders Behring Breivik的仇殺隊。

無聲政變：

Anders Behring Breivik成功的那天?！

警察毫不費力地建立了一個完整的對峙狀態，讓一個人，安德斯·貝林·布雷維克（Anders Behring Breivik）盡其所能，盡其所能，沒有一槍開槍制止他，無論是在奧斯陸還是在外島（Utøya ）工黨青少年度假營。當天有數千名警察在工作，沒有人被授權干預。 “是的，我們熱愛這個崛起的國家……”

在隨後的幾年中，挪威警察部隊升級為新的寶馬汽車，偵察直升機，新的服裝，全新的應急中心，以及在首都奧斯陸特別有大量警察出場。警察局堅定地回來了！

挪威人是一個好人。善良的人。一個可以信任的人。這就是為什麼來挪威的人們喜歡在這裡的原因。但是，在集體心理中的某個地方，我不確定這是什麼時候發生的，挪威人必須做出生存選擇。擔當溫柔的失敗者的角色，需要更強大的狗來確保他們的放心的支持，或者堅持真正的愛國主義，這種愛國主義足以使自己的兩隻腳站起來。足夠可靠，可以被他人信任，並且足夠誠實，可以不利用美國的慷慨。

 我們都想賣東西。天氣是54架F-35戰鬥機，服務，石油和天然氣，有時甚至是我們。有人指出，挪威已經成為美國的第51個州，這是有充分理由的。當挪威人唱歌時說：“是的，我們愛這個國家，因為它崛起。”這是有必要問的，他當時指的是哪個國家？這個國家是自由世界的燈塔，美利堅合眾國，或者是歐洲最外圍的一塊狹長的貧瘠土地，它正努力成為一個不誠實的國家，對自己和人民誠實？